1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00289861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex roles and friendship patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are generally in line with the results of Reeder's (2003) study, which showed that participants' gender role orientation 'matched' the sex of their friends (i.e., masculine people had more male friends, feminine people had more female friends), though in our study neither women's femininity nor men's masculinity could account for their proportion of CSFs vs. SSFs. Taken together, the accumulating body of evidence suggests that, unlike the findings of Monsour (2002) and Jones et al (1990), psychological androgyny per se isn't special with respect to cross-sex friendships. Instead, people who (claim to) possess traits traditionally associated with the other sex (i.e., high on cross-sex characteristics) tend to have more cross-sex friends.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are generally in line with the results of Reeder's (2003) study, which showed that participants' gender role orientation 'matched' the sex of their friends (i.e., masculine people had more male friends, feminine people had more female friends), though in our study neither women's femininity nor men's masculinity could account for their proportion of CSFs vs. SSFs. Taken together, the accumulating body of evidence suggests that, unlike the findings of Monsour (2002) and Jones et al (1990), psychological androgyny per se isn't special with respect to cross-sex friendships. Instead, people who (claim to) possess traits traditionally associated with the other sex (i.e., high on cross-sex characteristics) tend to have more cross-sex friends.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…That is, 'feminine' individuals (both men and women) reported having more female than male friends, and 'masculine' individuals (both men and women) reported having more male than female friends. Other researchers, however, have found somewhat different types of relationships between gender role and number of CSFs (Jones, Bloys, & Wood, 1990;Monsour, 1988, as cited in Monsour, 2002. For example, Monsour found that androgynous men, more so than gender-typed individuals and androgynous women, reported having more cross-sex friends, whereas Jones and colleagues found that androgynous individuals tend to have more male than female friends.…”
Section: Gender Role Orientationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Many of the details remind one of idiosyncratic, non-generalizable aspects of American friendship. Thus, low self-disclosure, a preference for activities over talking, and compartmentalization of friends have been ascribed more to male than female friendship styles (Bell, 1981;Jones et al, 1990;Mitchell, 1986;Pogrebin, 1987;Rubin, 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although there is strong evidence for the relationship between communality and friendship satisfaction and maintenance, past research suggests that more masculine individuals may also benefit in friendships. In her extensive review of gender and friendship, concludes that masculinity is important in predicting friendship satisfaction for both sexes (Jones, Bloys, & Wood, 1990). Investigating the fulfillment of friendship needs, Zarbatany et al (2004) conclude that masculinity is particularly important for predicting expectation fulfillment in men's friendship, but not women's.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%