Sex research conferences as heterotopias: A queer crip theory perspective on universal design

Abstract

Disability rights and LGBT2SQ+ rights are intertwined. LGBT2SQ+ individuals are more likely to be disabled persons and both communities experience societal stigma surrounding their sexuality. Crip theorists posit that ableism, heterosexism, and cissexism are rooted in the same fear of the untamable nature of the body/mind and its potential divergence from social norms. Building from queer theory, McRruer’s crip theory critically examines the concept of compulsory able-bodiedness as another facet of heteronormativity, where heterosexual, cisgendered, non-disabled bodies/minds are centered as the corporeal norm in society. Universal design encompasses the emergence of a society that considers diverse ways of being at conception, rather than creating environments that orbit around hegemonic norms with inclusion as an afterthought. Utilization of universal design is imperative in knowledge production spaces. Sexuality research conferences may be described as heterotopias, a phrase developed by Foucault to describe spaces in society that reside outside the hegemonic bounds of society, and yet mirror it in ways. Sexuality research conferences offer a space to explore themes around sexuality outside of rigid societal conventions. Yet, hegemonic norms may unconsciously seep into these spaces, resulting in the exclusion of disabled, Deaf, and LGBT2SQ+ individuals. Conferences frequently do not incorporate universal design. Utilizing a critical queer crip theory lens, we explore universal design in knowledge production spaces through a literature review and critical analysis of lived experiences with universal design planning of a sexuality research conference (i.e., CSRF, 2019). Translation of findings are summarized with recommendations of inclusive practices for future conferences.