2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-related variation in the dimensions of the mandibular ramus and its relationship with lower third molar impaction

Abstract: Objective We conducted this study to assess possible sex-related variations in the dimensions of the mandibular ramus. Methods We divided 240 patients into two groups: an impacted lower third molar group of 115 subjects (68 men and 47 women) and a normally erupted lower third molar group of 125 subjects (89 men and 36 women). Results The study identified multiple sex-related differences between impacted and normally erupted lower molar groups… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The longer the mandible, the greater the probability of M3 eruption 4 . The depth of the sigmoid notch, the depth of anterior and posterior notch of the mandibular ascending ramus (Figure 1), the length of the mandibular ascending ramus, the length of the condyle, the length of the coracoid process, the height and width of the total mandibular ascending ramus can affect the eruption of M3, but because of the race and other factors, it is controversial to predict M3 obstruction according to the morphology of mandible 5,6 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The longer the mandible, the greater the probability of M3 eruption 4 . The depth of the sigmoid notch, the depth of anterior and posterior notch of the mandibular ascending ramus (Figure 1), the length of the mandibular ascending ramus, the length of the condyle, the length of the coracoid process, the height and width of the total mandibular ascending ramus can affect the eruption of M3, but because of the race and other factors, it is controversial to predict M3 obstruction according to the morphology of mandible 5,6 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%