The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2012.405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-Related Location of Head and Neck Melanoma Strongly Argues for a Major Role of Sun Exposure in Cars and Photoprotection by Hair

Abstract: Head and neck melanomas (HNMs) are frequent and have a poorer prognosis than melanomas at other sites. Photoprotection in these locations is difficult. In this population-based study of 279 HNMs diagnosed in a French region between 2004 and 2009, major differences were found between genders. A clearcut, sex-related distribution was found between a "peripheral" area (scalp, forehead, temples, ears, and neck) and a "central" one (other parts of the face), with 56.7% of HNMs being located in the peripheral area i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
53
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(46 reference statements)
8
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides of the differences in genital MM, females from both strata show a higher number of MM in the legs than males; these results are in agreement with those obtained by others authors and are probably due to many different sexual dimorphic cultural or genetic factors [13, 15]. Moreover, males from both strata showed a higher number of MM in ears than females probably due to sun protection by hair, in agreement with results of other authors [22]. The fact that females from HSS showed more MM in dorsal feet and in dorsal hands than females from LSS is not clear for us; it may be due to different factors, as for example skin type and sun exposure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Besides of the differences in genital MM, females from both strata show a higher number of MM in the legs than males; these results are in agreement with those obtained by others authors and are probably due to many different sexual dimorphic cultural or genetic factors [13, 15]. Moreover, males from both strata showed a higher number of MM in ears than females probably due to sun protection by hair, in agreement with results of other authors [22]. The fact that females from HSS showed more MM in dorsal feet and in dorsal hands than females from LSS is not clear for us; it may be due to different factors, as for example skin type and sun exposure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Socioculturally determined gender identity and associated clothing, hair styles, and hairiness exert a dominating influence on the individual's skin health protective behavior. In this verve, gender‐specific anatomic locations of melanoma reflect these different patterns of sun protection habits .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Risk factors for the development of LM include history of sun exposure, light skin and propensity toward development of lentigines. LM is most commonly found on the cheek (estimated at 26-48% of lesions) [7][8][9]. Unlike superficial spreading melanoma, LMM is more strongly associated with previous development of lentigines and skin cancer history, and is not associated with pre-existing nevi or propensity toward development of nevi [10,11].…”
Section: Practice Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%