2022
DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeac042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-related differences in the management and outcomes of patients hospitalized with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison within four European myocardial infarction registries

Abstract: Background Data on how differences in risk-factors, treatments and outcomes differ between sexes in European countries are scarce. We aimed to study sex-related differences regarding baseline characteristics, in-hospital managements, and mortality of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in different European countries. Methods Patients over the age of 18 with STEMI who were treated in hospitals in 2014–2017 and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We saw no difference in the adjusted odds of mortality for females diagnosed with MIOCA at long term, consistent with others with longer-term follow-up up to 10 years. 27 As observed previously, 11 , 17 , 28 , 29 this study supports the finding that in the context of MIOCA, females have a greater risk factor and comorbidity burden and are less commonly prescribed secondary prevention pharmacotherapy than males, which may contribute to these findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We saw no difference in the adjusted odds of mortality for females diagnosed with MIOCA at long term, consistent with others with longer-term follow-up up to 10 years. 27 As observed previously, 11 , 17 , 28 , 29 this study supports the finding that in the context of MIOCA, females have a greater risk factor and comorbidity burden and are less commonly prescribed secondary prevention pharmacotherapy than males, which may contribute to these findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, we have observed that females diagnosed with MIOCA received significantly fewer discharge medications than men, a trend recently observed in a Europe-wide study. 17 We have recently shown that if females and males are provided with guideline-recommended therapy equally, then the long-term outcomes are similar between the sexes. 18 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undertreatment and higher mortality in women with ST-segment elevation MI, non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina have repeatedly been described during the past 20 years 72 . Despite increasing awareness of gender inequalities in the management of patients with ACS in Europe, a study published in 2022 using country-level data from four European countries confirmed that women still receive guideline-recommended therapies less often than men and have a higher mortality that persists after multivariate adjustment for known cardiovascular risk factors, including age 74 . Outcomes, including mortality, are worst among women aged <50 years, who are less likely to have ACS than men or older women 72 , 75 .…”
Section: Combined Influence Of Sex and Gender On Cvdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that these clinical studies using patients in countries with well-established cardiac coronary care, are of such low risk that additional therapy is unlikely to demonstrate any further benefit in outcome. This is despite the fact that, outside of clinical studies , mortality rates for hospitalized STEMI patients in Europe remain in the region of 15–25% [ 38 ], which demonstrates that there clearly remains a need for cardioprotective strategies, even if it is difficult to demonstrate in this population. A solution to this quandary may be to undertake future studies using this low-cost intervention in developing countries, where presenting patients are at significantly higher risk [ 10 , 35 , 47 ].…”
Section: Back To Basics: Understanding Remote Ischaemic Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%