2015
DOI: 10.1134/s0362119715050084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-related differences in task switching: An fMRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, however, recruitment of the DLPFC was found to be enhanced during attentional set-shifting in early postmenopausal women who were treated with estradiol compared with placebo in an fMRI study that used a double-blind crossover design [ 50 •]. This result is compatible with a female advantage recently reported on a measure of attentional shifting in younger adults < age 50 years [ 18 ]. Ovarian cycle-dependent effects on response inhibition, another function that evokes strong prefrontal recruitment [ 51 , 52 ], also have been reported [ 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Other Prefrontal Functionssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, however, recruitment of the DLPFC was found to be enhanced during attentional set-shifting in early postmenopausal women who were treated with estradiol compared with placebo in an fMRI study that used a double-blind crossover design [ 50 •]. This result is compatible with a female advantage recently reported on a measure of attentional shifting in younger adults < age 50 years [ 18 ]. Ovarian cycle-dependent effects on response inhibition, another function that evokes strong prefrontal recruitment [ 51 , 52 ], also have been reported [ 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Other Prefrontal Functionssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…A female advantage has been reported on certain WM tasks in young adults including the spatial working memory (SPWM) task of Duff and Hampson [ 14 ] (a task that requires the active holding and recurrent updating of spatial positions within WM) (Fig. 1 ), digit randomization, the double-span task, as well as, in NHP, the classic delayed response task [ 12 , 14 18 ], but a female advantage has been observed only when executive demands on WM are high and is not seen on simple span-capacity tasks (e.g., forward digit span) that lack a requirement for sustained mental manipulation of information and emphasize instead the passive storage elements of the WM system that are associated with perisylvian cortex [ 19 ]. Conversely, the N- back task is a WM task well suited to functional imaging studies, but it shows no, or even a reversed sex difference [ 20 •, 21 •], in spite of being subject to estrogen-related modulation at the neural level (see below).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there is evidence for better sequential multitasking performance in women than in men [1617]. For instance, Stoet and colleagues (2013) instructed participants to either repeat or switch between a shape discrimination task and a filling discrimination task [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, some studies report no gender differences [1215], while others report women to be better at multitasking than men [16, 17] or vice versa [18, 19]. Moreover, existing findings are difficult to compare and interpret because they either exclusively focused on sequential (e.g., task-switching, such as [17]) or concurrent multitasking (e.g., dual-tasking, such as [15]), or because they were based on very small sample sizes (e.g., gender differences in the PRP effect assessed with 10 subjects per gender group in [18] or relied on post-hoc exploratory analyses [21]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the underlying reasons were not clear. Evidence has demonstrated the differences in neural organization of task-switching process between females and males [38], which may explain part of the gender-specific findings. More studies are required to further confirm the findings and clarify the potential mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%