2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-related differences in subjective, but not neural, cue-elicited craving response in heavy cannabis users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, circulating sex hormones certainly contribute to effects of cannabis and cannabinoid administration (Castelli et al, 2014;Marusich et al, 2015;Struik et al, 2018;Winsauer et al, 2012). A 2020 study correlated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements with cannabis use and responses to cannabis-related cues (Prashad et al, 2020), and while neural response did not differ between males and females, females did have stronger subjective craving relative to males.…”
Section: Sex and Gender Differences In Cud And Cwsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, circulating sex hormones certainly contribute to effects of cannabis and cannabinoid administration (Castelli et al, 2014;Marusich et al, 2015;Struik et al, 2018;Winsauer et al, 2012). A 2020 study correlated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements with cannabis use and responses to cannabis-related cues (Prashad et al, 2020), and while neural response did not differ between males and females, females did have stronger subjective craving relative to males.…”
Section: Sex and Gender Differences In Cud And Cwsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, there is a growing body of preclinical literature suggesting that sex chromosomes, and organizational and activational effects of gonadal hormones may affect the endocannabinoid system (Cooper & Craft, 2018). There is some clinical evidence suggesting differences in patterns of use and subjective responses to cannabis across menstrual cycle phases (Hanzal et al, 2019; Prashad et al, 2020). In addition, preclinical and clinical studies suggested differences in the metabolism and subjective effects of alcohol across menstrual cycle phases, although the literature is inconsistent (Thomasson, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, THC may affect females at weaker levels than males because most of the THC is retained rather than metabolized (Fattore & Fratta, 2010). Female users also demonstrate a differential neural response associated with greater subjective craving for cannabis, relative to males (Prashad et al, 2020). Given the differences in neuroanatomical structures related to learning and memory and cannabinoid receptor availability between males and females described above, there also may be differing cognitive effects of exogenous cannabinoid exposure by sex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%