1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1981.tb04980.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEX RATIO OFRUMEX HASTATULUS:THE EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS AND CERTATION

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to several other dioecious species of Rumex with sex chromosomes (7,(21)(22)(23)(24), there is evidence that progeny sex ratios are also influenced by nongenetic factors, specifically the amount of pollen deposited on stigmas. By experimentally manipulating the distance between male pollen donors and female recipients of R. nivalis in a common garden, Stehlik and Barrett (25) demonstrated that seed sex ratios were dependent on the specific maternal pollination environment.…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to several other dioecious species of Rumex with sex chromosomes (7,(21)(22)(23)(24), there is evidence that progeny sex ratios are also influenced by nongenetic factors, specifically the amount of pollen deposited on stigmas. By experimentally manipulating the distance between male pollen donors and female recipients of R. nivalis in a common garden, Stehlik and Barrett (25) demonstrated that seed sex ratios were dependent on the specific maternal pollination environment.…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…Females at closer distances to males had higher stigmatic pollen loads and produced more strongly female-biased seed sex ratios compared with more distant females. However, attempts to demonstrate relations between male proximity and progeny sex ratios have been inconclusive in other Rumex species (23,24), and the role of maternal pollination environment in affecting progeny sex ratios in natural populations has not been investigated.Here we investigate whether the composition of the local mating neighborhood in natural populations of dioecious R. nivalis influences progeny sex ratios. Under the certation hypothesis, progeny sex ratios of maternal parents of R. nivalis located in close proximity to males should be more female-biased as a result of higher pollen loads, leading to increased competition between female-versus male-determining pollen tubes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this competition was particularly intense, for example, when pollen was very abundant, the competitive inferiority of the Y-bearing pollen was manifested as an increasing femalebiased sex ratio. Since Correns's (1917Correns's ( , 1928 work, pollen competition has been shown to influence the sex ratio in other plant species (Smith 1963;Conn and Blum 1981), especially those with chromosomal (i.e., X/Y) sex-determination mechanisms (Lloyd 1974). More recently, however, Correns's original results have proven difficult to reproduce (Carroll and Mulcahy 1993;Purrington 1993;Lassere et al 1996).…”
Section: Pollen Competition and The Sex Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results identify the ecological conditions under which sex-linked genes are most likely to realize a transmission advantage via sex-ratio distortion. We also address the long-standing hypothesis that pollen competition is the direct cause of sexratio bias in many plant species (Correns 1928;Smith 1963;Conn and Blum 1981;Carroll and Mulcahy 1993;Lassere et al 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, competition can be manipulated by varying the amount of pollen deposited, which significantly affects siring proportions in some species (e.g., Cucurbita pepo) but not others (9,25). In dioecious Rumex, the amount of pollen deposited alters the relative success of X-and Y-bearing gametophytes and hence the resulting sex ratio (26,27). A recent genomic analysis of fixed and polymorphic sites in Arabidopsis thaliana found evidence of both stronger purifying selection and more extensive positive selection among pollen-expressed genes than among randomly chosen genes (28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%