2010
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.116228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-Linked Inheritance in Macaque Monkeys: Implications for Effective Population Size and Dispersal to Sulawesi

Abstract: Sex-specific differences in dispersal, survival, reproductive success, and natural selection differentially affect the effective population size (N e ) of genomic regions with different modes of inheritance such as sex chromosomes and mitochondrial DNA. In papionin monkeys (macaques, baboons, geladas, mandrills, drills, and mangabeys), for example, these factors are expected to reduce N e of paternally inherited portions of the genome compared to maternally inherited portions. To explore this further, we quant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(119 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One process with the potential to cause discordance between gene trees and species trees is lineage sorting; lineage sorting occurs as a result of the coalescent process, and is likely to result in discordance when population sizes are large or when times between splitting events are short (Maddison 1997). Other factors that can lead to discordance include: (i) introgressive hybridization resulting from gene flow between differentiated lineages (Klymus et al 2010); (ii) differential selective sweeps in mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA markers (Evans et al 2010); and/ or (iii) the effects of sex-biased dispersal on patterns of genetic structure in maternally vs biparentally inherited markers (Lampert et al 2003). We used coalescent simulations in JML (Joly 2012) to test whether discordance across loci could be explained by lineage sorting alone, or whether other processes must be involved.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analyses: Mtdna-ndna Discordance and The Monophmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One process with the potential to cause discordance between gene trees and species trees is lineage sorting; lineage sorting occurs as a result of the coalescent process, and is likely to result in discordance when population sizes are large or when times between splitting events are short (Maddison 1997). Other factors that can lead to discordance include: (i) introgressive hybridization resulting from gene flow between differentiated lineages (Klymus et al 2010); (ii) differential selective sweeps in mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA markers (Evans et al 2010); and/ or (iii) the effects of sex-biased dispersal on patterns of genetic structure in maternally vs biparentally inherited markers (Lampert et al 2003). We used coalescent simulations in JML (Joly 2012) to test whether discordance across loci could be explained by lineage sorting alone, or whether other processes must be involved.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analyses: Mtdna-ndna Discordance and The Monophmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, here as well as in some other cases (Ruedi et al 1998), the geographic coverage of sampling on Sulawesi is poor. In taxa such as the macaques or the wild boar, the different Sulawesi lineages do not occur sympatrically, but it is doubtful whether monophyly of the Sulawesi taxa can be ruled out, either because there is insufficient support of the respective nodes (wild boars, Larson et al 2005) or because nuclear data are in conflict with the mtDNA gene trees on this point (macaques, Tosi et al 2003;Evans et al 2010). Not only is there no obvious respective pattern in the distribution of lineages that have colonized Sulawesi independently, there is in our opinion also little hard evidence for any Sulawesi clade being confined to part of the island only, which might suggest a link of its origin on Sulawesi and tectonic processes.…”
Section: The Origin Of Sulawesi Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the variation in condition is entirely environmental, stronger selection on condition in males will tend to exaggerate the intersexual difference in the variance of reproductive success. This causes additional differences between autosomal and sex-linked genes in the amount of drift they experience, affecting patterns of neutral diversity and adaptation (Storz et al 2001;Laporte and Charlesworth 2002;Hedrick 2007;Vicoso and Charlesworth 2009;Evans et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%