Abstract:Deception has always been a part of human communication as it helps to promote self-presentation. Although both men and women are equally prone to try to manage their appearance, their strategies, motivation and eagerness may be different. Here, we asked if lying could be influenced by gender on both the behavioral and neural levels. To test whether the hypothesized gender differences in brain activity related to deceptive responses were caused by differential socialization in men and women, we administered th… Show more
“…Our findings indicated that, the lying trials both in deceiving for obtaining rewards and deceiving for avoiding punishments conditions led to significantly larger increase in HbO in the PFC than truth-telling trials in the control condition, which was similar to previous brain imaging studies [12,20]. Numerous studies have revealed the important role of the PFC in deception [10][11][12][13], which mainly reflected various executive functions of the brain [12,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this study, we mainly focused on the inhibition function of the brain during deception [12,18], and thus we selected one channel in the right IFG and one channel in left MFG as two regions of interest (ROIs) respectively according to topographic images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have revealed the important role of the PFC in deception [10][11][12][13], which mainly reflected various executive functions of the brain [12,19]. Specially, both motivations would activate the right IFG during deception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent efforts have focused on finding some brain signatures that would allow for reliable detection of deception with various brain-imaging techniques [9]. As a result, some fMRI and fNIRS studies have consistently reported that the prefrontal cortex was involved in deceiving [10][11][12][13]. During the process of deception, the prefrontal cortex plays a significant role in executive functions, including planning, application of strategies, and suppressing the truth [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the prefrontal cortex is recognized as the primary activated brain area during deception [17]. Among the regions of the prefrontal cortex, the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the left middle frontal gyrus (MFG) were recognized as two important regions for deception [12,18]. Both regions were associated with inhibition, which is the fundamental function of deceiving [19].…”
Abstract:In this study, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was adopted to investigate the prefrontal cortical responses to deception under different motivations. By using a feigned memory impairment paradigm, 19 healthy adults were asked to deceive under the two different motivations: to obtain rewards and to avoid punishments. Results indicated that when deceiving for obtaining rewards, there was greater neural activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) than the control condition. When deceiving for avoiding punishments, there was greater activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the left middle frontal gyrus (MFG) than the control condition. In addition, deceiving for avoiding punishments led to greater neural activation in the left MFG than when deceiving for obtaining rewards. Furthermore, the results showed a moderate hit rate in detecting deception under either motivation. These results demonstrated that deception with different motivations led to distinct responses in the prefrontal cortex. fNIRS could provide a useful technique for the detection of deception with strategy of feigning memory impairment under different motivations.
“…Our findings indicated that, the lying trials both in deceiving for obtaining rewards and deceiving for avoiding punishments conditions led to significantly larger increase in HbO in the PFC than truth-telling trials in the control condition, which was similar to previous brain imaging studies [12,20]. Numerous studies have revealed the important role of the PFC in deception [10][11][12][13], which mainly reflected various executive functions of the brain [12,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this study, we mainly focused on the inhibition function of the brain during deception [12,18], and thus we selected one channel in the right IFG and one channel in left MFG as two regions of interest (ROIs) respectively according to topographic images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have revealed the important role of the PFC in deception [10][11][12][13], which mainly reflected various executive functions of the brain [12,19]. Specially, both motivations would activate the right IFG during deception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent efforts have focused on finding some brain signatures that would allow for reliable detection of deception with various brain-imaging techniques [9]. As a result, some fMRI and fNIRS studies have consistently reported that the prefrontal cortex was involved in deceiving [10][11][12][13]. During the process of deception, the prefrontal cortex plays a significant role in executive functions, including planning, application of strategies, and suppressing the truth [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the prefrontal cortex is recognized as the primary activated brain area during deception [17]. Among the regions of the prefrontal cortex, the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the left middle frontal gyrus (MFG) were recognized as two important regions for deception [12,18]. Both regions were associated with inhibition, which is the fundamental function of deceiving [19].…”
Abstract:In this study, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was adopted to investigate the prefrontal cortical responses to deception under different motivations. By using a feigned memory impairment paradigm, 19 healthy adults were asked to deceive under the two different motivations: to obtain rewards and to avoid punishments. Results indicated that when deceiving for obtaining rewards, there was greater neural activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) than the control condition. When deceiving for avoiding punishments, there was greater activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the left middle frontal gyrus (MFG) than the control condition. In addition, deceiving for avoiding punishments led to greater neural activation in the left MFG than when deceiving for obtaining rewards. Furthermore, the results showed a moderate hit rate in detecting deception under either motivation. These results demonstrated that deception with different motivations led to distinct responses in the prefrontal cortex. fNIRS could provide a useful technique for the detection of deception with strategy of feigning memory impairment under different motivations.
People tend to lie in varying degrees. To advance our understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms of this heterogeneity, we investigated individual differences in self‐serving lying. We performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in 37 participants and introduced a color‐reporting game where lying about the color would in general lead to higher monetary payoffs but would also be punished if get caught. At the behavioral level, individuals lied to different extents. Besides, individuals who are more dishonest showed shorter lying response time, whereas no significant correlation was found between truth‐telling response time and the degree of dishonesty. At the neural level, the left caudate, ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) were key regions reflecting individual differences in making dishonest decisions. The dishonesty associated activity in these regions decreased with increased dishonesty. Subsequent generalized psychophysiological interaction analyses showed that individual differences in self‐serving lying were associated with the functional connectivity among the caudate, vmPFC, IFG, and dlPFC. More importantly, regardless of the decision types, the neural patterns of the left caudate and vmPFC during the decision‐making phase could be used to predict individual degrees of dishonesty. The present study demonstrated that lying decisions differ substantially from person to person in the functional connectivity and neural activation patterns which can be used to predict individual degrees of dishonesty.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.