2014
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.12300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex identification and PIT‐tagging: tools and prospects for studying intersexual differences in freshwater fishes

Abstract: This study evaluated a technique to allow the long-term monitoring of individual fishes of known sex in the wild using sex confirmation in close proximity to the reproductive period combined with individual tagging. Hundreds of partially migratory roach Rutilus rutilus were tagged with passive integrated transponders (PIT) following sex determination in spring and various performance measures were compared with fish tagged outside the reproductive period in autumn. Short-term survival was >95% for R. rutilus s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method of PIT tagging has no significant effect on survival or body condition in roach 30, 31 . We then transported all fish back to the lake of origin where they were released at the approximate location of capture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This method of PIT tagging has no significant effect on survival or body condition in roach 30, 31 . We then transported all fish back to the lake of origin where they were released at the approximate location of capture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…After fish anesthetization, a 4–5 mm vertical incision was made 3 cm posterior to the pelvic fin, and a 32 mm PIT tag for asp (Oregon RFID, half-duplex, diameter 3.65 mm, weight 0.8 g, ISO 11784/11785 compatible) or a 23 mm PIT tag for bleak (Oregon RFID, half-duplex, diameter 3.65 mm, weight 0.6 g, ISO 11784/11785 compatible) was inserted into the body cavity. No sutures were used to close the incision according to cyprinid tagging methodology 28 , 29 . The tagged individuals were released immediately after recovery from anaesthesia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After removing 3–4 scales, a 4–5 mm vertical incision was made 3 cm posterior to the pelvic fin, and a PIT tag (Oregon RFID, half-duplex, length 32 mm, diameter 3.65 mm, weight 0.8 g, ISO 11784/11785 compatible) was inserted into the body cavity. No sutures were used to close the incision, according to a previously described cyprinid tagging methodology 48, 49 . The tagged individuals were released immediately after recovery from anaesthesia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%