2023
DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1153907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex hormones and risk of epilepsy: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

Abstract: BackgroundMultiple evidence has suggested complex interaction between sex hormones and epilepsy. However, whether there exists a causal association and the effect direction remains controversial. Here we aimed to examine the causative role of hormones in the risk of epilepsy and vice versa.MethodsWe conducted a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies of major sex hormones including testosterone (N = 425,097), estradiol (N = 311,675… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical analysis for MR: The causal relationship between exposure variables and outcome variables was assessed using inverse variance weighted median (IVW). IVW is the main method commonly used in MR studies, which summarizes the magnitude of the effect of individual SNPs on the symptoms (Wald ratios) through the inverse variance weighted median pattern in meta-analysis, and ultimately evaluates causality across all the IVs and outcome variables [22] .…”
Section: Research Design 1 Mendelian Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analysis for MR: The causal relationship between exposure variables and outcome variables was assessed using inverse variance weighted median (IVW). IVW is the main method commonly used in MR studies, which summarizes the magnitude of the effect of individual SNPs on the symptoms (Wald ratios) through the inverse variance weighted median pattern in meta-analysis, and ultimately evaluates causality across all the IVs and outcome variables [22] .…”
Section: Research Design 1 Mendelian Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%