1994
DOI: 10.1037/h0095558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex, games, and videotapes: An HIV-prevention intervention for men who are homeless and mentally ill.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twelve papers reported programmes in North America and two from the UK. The papers reviewed were subdivided into anecdotal accounts of positive outcomes (Sadow & Corman 1983, Davidhizar et al . 1991, Susser & Valencia 1994, Woolf & Jackson 1996, Assalian et al .…”
Section: Overview Of the Sexual Health Education Programmesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Twelve papers reported programmes in North America and two from the UK. The papers reviewed were subdivided into anecdotal accounts of positive outcomes (Sadow & Corman 1983, Davidhizar et al . 1991, Susser & Valencia 1994, Woolf & Jackson 1996, Assalian et al .…”
Section: Overview Of the Sexual Health Education Programmesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The education programmes varied in content and teaching methods and entailed between three (Goisman et al . 1991) and 15 (Susser & Valencia 1994) sessions of contact. Some programmes were designed to be gender‐specific (Goisman et al .…”
Section: Overview Of the Sexual Health Education Programmesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sex, Games and Videotapes comprise 15 sessions 21,22 . In the ® rst session, Say the word, we aim to create an atmosphere in which the men feel they can be forthcoming in talking about sex.…”
Section: The Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During each assessment, we collected detailed information regarding sexual risk behaviours known to be related to HIV transmission. The follow-up instrument was modi® ed from a standard, reliable research instrument Ð the same one used at baseline 22,28 . Interviewers were blind as to the group status.…”
Section: Testing the Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%