2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsir.2021.100171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex estimation using discriminant analysis of hand dimensions among adult population in Ghana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the results obtained through the Monte Carlo simulation showed that the DA-OS scheme achieved a small CFAR loss of approximately 0.392 dB, relative to the average cell scheme (CA) in homogeneous radar return conditions with a possible detection of 0.5. These results outperform previous results and are in line with [20], [21], which used technological approaches in securing wildlife from human activity.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Additionally, the results obtained through the Monte Carlo simulation showed that the DA-OS scheme achieved a small CFAR loss of approximately 0.392 dB, relative to the average cell scheme (CA) in homogeneous radar return conditions with a possible detection of 0.5. These results outperform previous results and are in line with [20], [21], which used technological approaches in securing wildlife from human activity.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…[26,27] It can be seen in Figure 3. It is inconsistent with study carried out in Ghana, Maalman et al (2021). It was found that there is very good correlation between the length of left hand and right hand as well as breath of left and right hand of the respondents.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Detailed about the data were given in Kumar et al [19] The hand index is described as the ratio between the handbreadth and the hand length multiplied by 100. [20][21][22] The distribution of the hand indices has been considered based on the standard Krogman hand indices classification which is described in a study conducted in Ghana and cited in Maalman et al [23] According to Chadra et al, the five classifications of the hand indices are: [22] A) Hyperdolicholicheri [40.9] B) Dolichocheri [41.0-43.9], C) Mesocheri [44.0-46.9], D) Brachycheri [47.0-49.9] and E) Hyperbrachycheri [50.0].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of the hand indices have been considered based on the standard Krogman hand indices classi cation which is described in a study conducted in Ghana and cited in [23]. According to [22],the ve classi cations of the hand indices are:…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%