2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences on elementary cognitive tasks despite no differences on the Wonderlic Personnel Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can also be speculated that women’s slower STRTs during reading are simply an example of a female disadvantage in reaction time, observed by Pesta, Bertsch, Poznanski, and Bommer (2008). However, at least one study (Schmitt, Leclerc, & Dube-Rioux, 1988) found just the opposite: shorter response latencies among female participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also be speculated that women’s slower STRTs during reading are simply an example of a female disadvantage in reaction time, observed by Pesta, Bertsch, Poznanski, and Bommer (2008). However, at least one study (Schmitt, Leclerc, & Dube-Rioux, 1988) found just the opposite: shorter response latencies among female participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtaining high-performance cognitive function benefit people in life. Until now, many studies have been conducted to measure cognitive performance through various cognitive assessments such as the Wonderlic test (Pesta et al, 2008), Cognitive Assessment Battery (Golan et al, 2019), Raven's tests (Friedman et al, 2019), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Chiti and Pantoni, 2014). However, the research usually used behavioral data as the main indicator for evaluating cognitive function without considering the brain responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%