2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.05.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences of Patients With Systemic Hypertension (From the Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial [SPRINT])

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results clearly showed that male subjects were at a greater risk of MACE than female subjects, and this difference between sexes tended to be greater at a younger age. Our results also can be supported by a recent post-hoc analysis of SPRINT 25 . After sex-specific propensity score-matched analysis between intensive and standard BP control, the aforementioned study reported that intensive BP control was effective in lowering CVD risk in men (HR, 0.70; 95% CI 0.57–0.86) but not in women (HR, 0.82; 95% CI 0.60–1.12).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Our results clearly showed that male subjects were at a greater risk of MACE than female subjects, and this difference between sexes tended to be greater at a younger age. Our results also can be supported by a recent post-hoc analysis of SPRINT 25 . After sex-specific propensity score-matched analysis between intensive and standard BP control, the aforementioned study reported that intensive BP control was effective in lowering CVD risk in men (HR, 0.70; 95% CI 0.57–0.86) but not in women (HR, 0.82; 95% CI 0.60–1.12).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, a subsequent SPRINT post hoc sex-specific analysis has been undertaken utilising patient-level data [ 46 ]. In SPRINT, randomisation was not stratified according to sex; therefore, propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics between intensive versus standard treatment groups in both males and females.…”
Section: Sex-specific Hypertension Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a separate study by Ochoa-Jimene et al, the patient-level data from SPRINT were analyzed to determine whether BP treatment effects differed by gender in participants less than 60 or over 60 26 in propensity score-matched populations. To account for the difference in baseline CV risk among men and women in SPRINT, propensity score matching was used to take into account this potentially confounding variable that can bias an outcome to control for baseline differences.…”
Section: Hypertension From Her Point Of Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%