1939
DOI: 10.1037/h0053996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in vocational interests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

1941
1941
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies were possibly the first explicit referrals to a people-things dimension contributing to the sex differences in occupational interests. These sex differences were further confirmed by Finch and Odoroff in 1939 [ 12 ] or more recently by Mozahem and colleagues in Lebanon ( d = 0.8) [ 13 ]. On the basis of these findings it is not surprising that today, many of the occupational sex differences (e.g., few female electricians) have been explained by boys’ and men’s greater interest in things (i.e., mechanical tools, machines, or gadgets) as opposed to an interest in helping people or living beings more broadly, and the reverse for girls and women [ 3 5 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…These studies were possibly the first explicit referrals to a people-things dimension contributing to the sex differences in occupational interests. These sex differences were further confirmed by Finch and Odoroff in 1939 [ 12 ] or more recently by Mozahem and colleagues in Lebanon ( d = 0.8) [ 13 ]. On the basis of these findings it is not surprising that today, many of the occupational sex differences (e.g., few female electricians) have been explained by boys’ and men’s greater interest in things (i.e., mechanical tools, machines, or gadgets) as opposed to an interest in helping people or living beings more broadly, and the reverse for girls and women [ 3 5 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…These studies were possibly the first explicit referrals to a people-things dimension contributing to the sex differences in occupational interests. These sex differences were further confirmed by Finch and Odoroff in 1939 [12] or more recently by Mozahem and colleagues in Lebanon (d = 0.8) [13]. On the basis of these findings it is not surprising that today, many of the occupational sex differences (e.g., few female electricians) have been explained by boys' and men's greater interest in things (i.e., mechanical tools, machines, or gadgets) as opposed to an interest in helping people or living beings more broadly, and the reverse for girls and women [3-5, 14, 15].…”
Section: Sex Differences In Occupational Interests and Choicessupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Carter and Strong (1933) found that secondary school girls had higher scores on the Strong Blank for men on the scales for occupations involving language and contact with people, while the scores of boys were lower on most of the scales except those in the science group. Finch and Odoroff (1939) reported similar findings.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%