2016
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1085-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: A meta-analysis

Abstract: Visual-spatial working memory measures are widely used in clinical and experimental settings. Furthermore, it has been argued that the male advantage in spatial abilities can be explained by a sex difference in visual-spatial working memory. Therefore, sex differences in visual-spatial working memory have important implication for research, theory, and practice, but they have yet to be quantified. The present metaanalysis quantified the magnitude of sex differences in visualspatial working memory and examined … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
149
4
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
12
149
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the high classification accuracy in bilateral precuneus might be linked to the established male advantage in visuo-spatial working memory, which has recently been demonstrated based on a large meta-analysis (Voyer D et al 2017).…”
Section: Spatially Specific Effectsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Finally, the high classification accuracy in bilateral precuneus might be linked to the established male advantage in visuo-spatial working memory, which has recently been demonstrated based on a large meta-analysis (Voyer D et al 2017).…”
Section: Spatially Specific Effectsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Given the fundamental nature of memory, it is somewhat surprising that memory function differs between males and females. Nevertheless, sex differences have been observed across a broad range of memory tasks including verbal memory (Kramer et al, 1988), context fear conditioning (Maren et al, 1994; Keiser et al, in review ), extinction of fear conditioning (Lebron-Milad et al, 2012), reward-related learning (Quinn et al, 2007), and spatial memory (Voyer et al, 2016), among others (see also Andreano and Cahill, 2009; Galea et al, 2013). Sex differences are also evident across the cognitive strategies used to learn a task (Grissom et al, 2013; Shah et al, 2013), neural circuits recruited for memory (Gruene et al, 2014), the molecular mechanisms of memory (Keiser and Tronson, 2016), and the modulation of memory by stress (Waddell et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no overt differences between males and females in cognitive faculties have been documented across mammals [10], a reliable, but modest, performance advantage of males compared to females on spatial tasks has been reported in both rodents [11] and humans [12]. A widely used behavioral assay for testing spatial learning and memory across the lifespan in rodents is the hippocampus-dependent spatial version of the Morris watermaze task, in which animals learn the location of a hidden escape platform in a tank of cold water over several days [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%