Gender Differences in Prenatal Substance Exposure. 2012
DOI: 10.1037/13092-008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in the teratogenic effects of alcohol: Findings from animal models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sex differences were not detected in the present study in the fluid reasoning and executive functioning or learning and memory domains, but females performed worse on a measure of visual spatial ability (AW), and on 1 measure in the language domain (WD) across exposure history. While investigations of sexually dimorphic behavior using human subjects with FASD have been limited and we are hesitant to over interpret the current findings, our results are consistent with animal studies that found sexually dimorphic behaviors and abilities in rats with prenatal alcohol exposure follow a pattern similar to those of control rats (Otero and Kelly, ). Furthermore, many of the sexually dimorphic secondary disabilities in FASD, reviewed by Streissguth (), such as rates of confinement and school suspensions/expulsions, are also sexually dimorphic in the general population (Golinelli and Minton, ), which may help to explain why we did not see any interactions between exposure history and sex in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sex differences were not detected in the present study in the fluid reasoning and executive functioning or learning and memory domains, but females performed worse on a measure of visual spatial ability (AW), and on 1 measure in the language domain (WD) across exposure history. While investigations of sexually dimorphic behavior using human subjects with FASD have been limited and we are hesitant to over interpret the current findings, our results are consistent with animal studies that found sexually dimorphic behaviors and abilities in rats with prenatal alcohol exposure follow a pattern similar to those of control rats (Otero and Kelly, ). Furthermore, many of the sexually dimorphic secondary disabilities in FASD, reviewed by Streissguth (), such as rates of confinement and school suspensions/expulsions, are also sexually dimorphic in the general population (Golinelli and Minton, ), which may help to explain why we did not see any interactions between exposure history and sex in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It is possible that environmental factors outside of prenatal alcohol exposure may contribute to these differences and in general, most studies investigating neuropsychological performance and behavior in humans with prenatal alcohol exposure have not explored sex effects, perhaps due to limitations of sample size. While animal studies have addressed sex effects after prenatal exposure to alcohol more extensively than human studies have, many of these studies lack sufficient power to detect interactive effects, decreasing reliability of the results (see Otero and Kelly, ). One replicated effect is that prenatal alcohol exposure lowers testosterone levels in male rodent fetuses, reducing the differentiation of the male brain, ultimately causing the brains of males with prenatal alcohol exposure to be feminized (Otero and Kelly, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition only 2 symptoms significantly differed for females at the 1.0 level and 1 at the 1.5 level. Sex differences are not frequently studied in FASD [26,27] and the results from this study suggest that more attention should be given to how alcohol-related neurobehavioral deficits may manifest as a function of biological sex. This should not be unexpected for this disorder given that other psychiatric conditions also have variable expression as a function of biological sex [28][29][30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Individuals with FASD experience significant neurocognitive and behavioral difficulties (Cook et al, 2016) and many also navigate complex physical and mental health challenges and environmental adversity across the lifespan (Flannigan et al, 2021; McLachlan et al, 2020). Most data on sex‐based differences in PAE/FASD come from the animal literature (Otero & Kelly, 2012), where researchers have identified differential impacts on fetal growth (Kwan et al, 2020), metabolic and immune function (Bake et al, 2021; Ieraci & Herrera, 2020), neurotransmitter systems (Converse et al, 2014), DNA methylation (Lussier et al, 2021), brain volume, memory (Zimmerberg et al, 1991), behavior, and social interaction (Bake et al, 2021). Across these studies, male animals tended to be more susceptible than females to the damaging impacts of PAE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%