2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13293-019-0277-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in the risk of vascular disease associated with diabetes

Abstract: Diabetes is a strong risk factor for vascular disease. There is compelling evidence that the relative risk of vascular disease associated with diabetes is substantially higher in women than men. The mechanisms that explain the sex difference have not been identified. However, this excess risk could be due to certain underlying biological differences between women and men. In addition to other cardiometabolic pathways, sex differences in body anthropometry and patterns of storage of adipose tissue may be of par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
90
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
6
90
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“… 133 Overall, diabetes is a stronger risk factor for the onset of ischaemic heart disease, heart failure, stroke, cancer, and dementia in women than in men. 134 , 135 …”
Section: Sex and Gender Differences In Major Chronic Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 133 Overall, diabetes is a stronger risk factor for the onset of ischaemic heart disease, heart failure, stroke, cancer, and dementia in women than in men. 134 , 135 …”
Section: Sex and Gender Differences In Major Chronic Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Log-binomial models were used to assess the association of risk factors with race/ethnicity in univariate and multivariable models, adjusted for gender and neighborhood poverty level, and to quantify the corresponding relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Adjustment for gender and neighborhood poverty level was included because of their importance in the epidemiology and pathophysiology of disease [ 16 19 ]. When a significant interaction ( p < 0.05) existed between covariates, RR and 95% CI of linear combinations of covariates were calculated, and the main effect of the independent variable of interest was reported at the reference level of the covariate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male animals were exclusively used in the animal studies (Table 2), possibly due to avoiding potential CV protective effects of estrogen, which needs to be considered in the case of female animals. However, diabetes confers a higher relative risk of CVD mortality among women than among men [110,111]. It remains completely unclear whether the CV effects of GIP demonstrated in male animals can be observed in female non-diabetic and diabetic mice.…”
Section: Limitation Of Animal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%