2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.06.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences in the Repair of Retinal Detachments in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ung et al showed that the mean age lies between 25 and 35 years and scleral buckling procedures remained highly effective in this selected group of patient [6]. Interestingly, this type of RRD was found predominantly in females [6][7][8]. In the present study, we also found a trend (not statistically significant) of female predominance (55%) in the age group 20-39 years of age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Ung et al showed that the mean age lies between 25 and 35 years and scleral buckling procedures remained highly effective in this selected group of patient [6]. Interestingly, this type of RRD was found predominantly in females [6][7][8]. In the present study, we also found a trend (not statistically significant) of female predominance (55%) in the age group 20-39 years of age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…17,18 Although female sex has not been reliably associated with more favorable anatomic outcomes in RRD, recent evidence has pointed to possible differences in time to repair between selfreported male and self-reported female individuals. 19 The patients in this cohort had favorable visual outcomes across both the SOS and SOF groups. It has been shown in retrospective studies 20 as well as PIVOT 2 that even eyes that fail initial repair with PR may have good visual outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Gerstenberger et al found higher incidence rates of rhegmatogenous RD in males in a population-based cohort study (OR = 4.16) [ 13 ]. Furthermore, the published literature has also identified higher rates of reoperation in males than females; Callaway et al found that women were less likely than men to undergo reoperation after primary PR (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.62, 0.79, p < 001) [ 31 ]. The reason underlying these results could be due to biological factors, such as abnormal adhesions in the vitreoretinal interface and longer axial lengths seen in males [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the published literature has also identified higher rates of reoperation in males than females; Callaway et al found that women were less likely than men to undergo reoperation after primary PR (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.62, 0.79, p < 001) [ 31 ]. The reason underlying these results could be due to biological factors, such as abnormal adhesions in the vitreoretinal interface and longer axial lengths seen in males [ 31 ]. Additionally, behaviour differences between sexes could interfere with adherence to postoperative positioning [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%