2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in the relationship between planum temporale asymmetry and corpus callosum morphology in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): A combined MRI and DTI analysis

Abstract: Increases brain size has been hypothesized to be inversely associated with the expression of behavioral and brain asymmetries within and between species. We tested this hypothesis by analyzing the relation between asymmetries in the planum temporale (PT) and different measures of the corpus callosum (CC) including surface area, streamline count as measured from diffusion tensor imaging, fractional anisotropy values and the ratio in the number of fibers to surface area in a sample of chimpanzees. We found that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(75 reference statements)
2
9
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1). This contrasts with previous analyses, which report a linear trajectory of development, suggesting an ongoing increase in relative area into old age (Hopkins et al, 2016;Hopkins & Phillips, 2010). This difference in the reported trajectories may be attributed to the fact that previously used linear or cubic polynomial fitting approaches are rigid, as the entire age range determines the results (Fjell et al, 2010), while in this study, we used GAMs, by means of smooth terms, which optimise curve fitting to better fit "local" data points (Sørensen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1). This contrasts with previous analyses, which report a linear trajectory of development, suggesting an ongoing increase in relative area into old age (Hopkins et al, 2016;Hopkins & Phillips, 2010). This difference in the reported trajectories may be attributed to the fact that previously used linear or cubic polynomial fitting approaches are rigid, as the entire age range determines the results (Fjell et al, 2010), while in this study, we used GAMs, by means of smooth terms, which optimise curve fitting to better fit "local" data points (Sørensen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Expectedly, similar dissociation between the two species are also found regarding the corpus callosum. While studies on humans report a prominent decline of midsagittal callosal area (Doraiswamy et al, 1991;Hasan et al, 2008;Prendergast et al, 2015;Raz et al, 2010;Skumlien et al, 2018) or thickness (Danielsen et al, 2020), preservation of callosal area has been reported in aging chimpanzees (Hopkins et al, 2016;Hopkins & Phillips, 2010). The present study, while confirming the general differences in aging trajectories of the corpus callosum of the two species, offers a series of important clarifications and novel data to the literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jäncke et al, 1994), but this has also been reported, albeit to a lesser extent, in chimpanzees too (e.g. Hopkins et al 2016;Taglialatela et al, 2007). The inferior parietal lobe (IPL), which surrounds the posterior termination of the SF, has expanded considerably during human evolution to be uniquely large compared to other great apes (Rilling and Seligman, 2002;Coolidge,…”
Section: Biological and Functional Implications Of Sf Findingsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans diverged as late as 6.3 million years ago (Patterson et al, 2006) and despite the chimpanzee brain being about one third of the size of the human brain, share similarities in gross and sulcal anatomy. Several studies have found evidence of cerebral asymmetries in the chimpanzee, albeit often diminished compared to humans, including left lateralised Total SF Length asymmetry (Yeni-Komshian and Benson, 1976;Hopkins et al 2000, Cantalupo et al 2003, SF depth asymmetry (Bogart et al 2012), leftward PT surface area asymmetry (Gannon et al, 1998;Hopkins et al, 2016), and rightward PP surface area asymmetry (Gannon et al 2005;Taglialatela et al 2007) (see Hopkins et al 2015…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%