2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences in the Management of Oral Anticoagulation and Outcomes for Emergency Department Presentation of Incident Atrial Fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 15 In this systematic review of observational studies versus randomized clinical trials, the higher risk profiles of AF patients in clinical practice treated with apixaban 2.5 mg (vs. 5 mg) may explain (i) the higher‐than‐expected thromboembolic event rates in the clinic and (ii) the higher rates of major bleeding and mortality. 15 In addition, some recent research studies reported the sex differences in the management of OAC and outcomes 12 , 54 but further research investigating sex‐specific differences in the appropriateness of DOACs prescription in different populations of clinical practice is still needed. There is also a need of a well‐designed randomized clinical trial that compares each DOAC and specific dose with regard to sex‐specific of efficacy and safety in a representative population of clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 15 In this systematic review of observational studies versus randomized clinical trials, the higher risk profiles of AF patients in clinical practice treated with apixaban 2.5 mg (vs. 5 mg) may explain (i) the higher‐than‐expected thromboembolic event rates in the clinic and (ii) the higher rates of major bleeding and mortality. 15 In addition, some recent research studies reported the sex differences in the management of OAC and outcomes 12 , 54 but further research investigating sex‐specific differences in the appropriateness of DOACs prescription in different populations of clinical practice is still needed. There is also a need of a well‐designed randomized clinical trial that compares each DOAC and specific dose with regard to sex‐specific of efficacy and safety in a representative population of clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stroke risk (as evaluated by the CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score) is significantly higher for women with AF than for their men counterparts, regardless of the age and comorbidity profile in contrast to the CHADS 2 score 5,7–9 . Regardless or not of the CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score, however, it has been reported that women are significantly less likely to receive OACs 10–12 . A recent publication demonstrated that in real life (and in contrast to the data from randomized clinical trials), women with AF are more likely to receive low‐dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) than standard‐dose DOACs 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 Prior research in this area may have been susceptible to selection and information biases stemming from limited patient populations and reliance on only hospital-level data. 4,[29][30][31] Indeed, patients treated solely in primary care are typically older high-risk individuals, and the lack of primary-care data may significantly compromise the eral interpretation of previous findings. Thus, the present study's findings substantially enhance our understanding of the real-life implementation of clinical practice guidelines regarding OAC utilization in men and women with AF on a nationwide level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings may overall represent suboptimal management of hemostasis in women. Previous work suggests women with valvular atrial fibrillation are prescribed oral anticoagulation less frequently than men 67 which may also translate to other cardiovascular conditions. Moreover, women may have a hypercoagulable state that is hypothesized to relate to intrinsic sex‐specific and hormonal risk factors 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%