1994
DOI: 10.1159/000126804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences in the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Response to Inflammatory and Neuroendocrine Stressors

Abstract: Susceptibility to inflammatory disease in infantile Lewis (LEW/N) female rats seems to be related to their impaired hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis response to different inflammatory stimuli, while the relative resistance to this type of disease in Fischer (F344/N) female rats is apparently due to their potent HPA axis response to the same stimuli. In the present study, we attempted to elucidate whether there is an impairment in the HPA axis response in the juvenile female LEW/N rat to inflammatory an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
26
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, female Fischer rats show an immediate rise of plasma corticosterone following centrally applied CRH, compared to the relatively delayed increase observed in female Lewis rats (Windle et al, 1998). Likewise, it has been demonstrated that female Fischer rats are more sensitive to CRH-induced ACTH augmentation than Lewis rats (Spinedi et al, 1994). These findings, taken together with the strain differences we observed in both CRH and corticosterone availability at the anterior pituitary gland, suggest that at least one of the underlying mechanisms mediating the strain differences may be related to the apparent strain-dependent sensitivity to the effects of CRH, which would then impact stressor-associated HPA activation and behavioral change (Berridge and Dunn, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, female Fischer rats show an immediate rise of plasma corticosterone following centrally applied CRH, compared to the relatively delayed increase observed in female Lewis rats (Windle et al, 1998). Likewise, it has been demonstrated that female Fischer rats are more sensitive to CRH-induced ACTH augmentation than Lewis rats (Spinedi et al, 1994). These findings, taken together with the strain differences we observed in both CRH and corticosterone availability at the anterior pituitary gland, suggest that at least one of the underlying mechanisms mediating the strain differences may be related to the apparent strain-dependent sensitivity to the effects of CRH, which would then impact stressor-associated HPA activation and behavioral change (Berridge and Dunn, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The suppression of response observed in male rats contrasts with a hyperresponsiveness in female animals exposed to stress (Spinedi et al, 1994). This difference is not simply a reflection of the attenuated response of males but represents a positive enhancement of responsiveness by estradiol (E), with ovariectomy reducing responsiveness and E replacement returning stress-responsiveness to levels observed in intact females (Leniewska et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mammals also display gender-related differences in responsiveness to stress (Aloisi et al, 1994;Heuser et al, 1994;Spinedi et al, 1994) and reduced responsiveness of the pituitary-adrenal axis to stress in mammals has been linked to elevated androgen levels (Boissy and Bouissou, 1994;Bingaman et al, 1995) while enhancement of responsiveness has been linked to estrogen in the female (Burgess and Handa, 1992). Androgenic suppression of the HPA axis has evolved in mammals to reduce the impact of stress on reproductive processes (Handa et al, 1994) while the enhanced stress responsiveness of the female may be a mechanism whereby environmental conditions unfavourable to reproduction can inhibit reproductive processes (Viau and Meaney, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex-differences in the endocrine response to fear conditioning are important for two main reasons. First, sex differences in ACTH response to stress in rats appear to be dependent on the particular type of stressor studied (Babb et al, 2013b;Spinedi et al, 1994;Watanobe, 2002). Second, characterization of ACTH response to fear-conditioning can contribute to determine whether or not females are actually less sensitive than males to fear conditioning.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%