2022
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2110416119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in the functional topography of association networks in youth

Abstract: Prior work has shown that there is substantial interindividual variation in the spatial distribution of functional networks across the cerebral cortex, or functional topography. However, it remains unknown whether there are sex differences in the topography of individualized networks in youth. Here, we leveraged an advanced machine learning method (sparsity-regularized non-negative matrix factorization) to define individualized functional networks in 693 youth (ages 8 to 23 y) who underwent functional MRI as p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general lack of predictability of internalizing behaviors seen here and in prior work may be related to individual differences in the signal-to-noise ratio in the associations between functional connectivity and the behaviors themselves. Furthermore, the presence of significant predictions of internalizing behaviors in females, but not in males, may be underscored by the earlier development of functional networks, and especially the heteromodal association networks, in females during childhood (7,62). The delayed development of association networks-which drive these behavioral predictions-paired with the lower levels of internalizing behaviors observed in males, could in part explain the lower observed accuracies in males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general lack of predictability of internalizing behaviors seen here and in prior work may be related to individual differences in the signal-to-noise ratio in the associations between functional connectivity and the behaviors themselves. Furthermore, the presence of significant predictions of internalizing behaviors in females, but not in males, may be underscored by the earlier development of functional networks, and especially the heteromodal association networks, in females during childhood (7,62). The delayed development of association networks-which drive these behavioral predictions-paired with the lower levels of internalizing behaviors observed in males, could in part explain the lower observed accuracies in males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional networks are bounded by the anatomical structure of neural connections (Xie et al, 2021 ). The topology of functional networks is dependent on individual development (Shanmugan et al, 2022 ). Furthermore, Functional connectivity (FC) can be used to predict behavioral traits such as fluid intelligence or even personality factors (NEO-FFI; Li et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Brain Functional Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiscale functional connectivity measures were computed from each preprocessed rsfMRI scan based on functional networks (FNs) obtained using a personalized functional network computational method (Li et al, 2017; Cui et al, 2020). We computed personalized FNs for each individual subject using a group-sparsity regularized non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) method (Li et al, 2017; Cui et al, 2020), which has been successfully adopted in multiple recent studies for computing personalized FNs (Cui et al, 2022; Pines et al, 2022; Shanmugan et al, 2022). Particularly, we first computed group-level FNs using a normalized-cuts based spectral clustering method to identify representative FNs from 50 sets of group-level FNs, each set being computed on a subset of 150 subjects randomly selected from each of the sites with a probability proportional to the sample sizes of different sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%