2014
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2013.875889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in the ability to recognise non-verbal displays of emotion: A meta-analysis

Abstract: The present study aimed to quantify the magnitude of sex differences in humans' ability to accurately recognise non-verbal emotional displays. Studies of relevance were those that required explicit labelling of discrete emotions presented in the visual and/or auditory modality. A final set of 551 effect sizes from 215 samples was included in a multilevel meta-analysis. The results showed a small overall advantage in favour of females on emotion recognition tasks (d=0.19). However, the magnitude of that sex dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
222
6
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 379 publications
(326 citation statements)
references
References 203 publications
34
222
6
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Also similar was the correlation of the sex with active listening which was found in all the ALAS subscales (Kourmousi et al 2017a). Although sex differences have not been sufficiently examined concerning the ability to actively empathically listen (Pence and James 2015), women have been reported by most researchers to dispose higher levels of empathy than men (Spreng et al 2009;Youssef et al 2014;Toussaint and Webb 2005;Kourmousi et al 2017b) due to their tendency to be more empathetic, pay closer attention to the speaker and the things said, and listen more effectively (Christov-Moore et al 2014;Rueckert and Naybar 2008;Rueckert et al 2011;Thompson and Voyer 2014). However, there are studies which have found no significant differences between males and females in empathy (e.g., Baldner and McGinley 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Also similar was the correlation of the sex with active listening which was found in all the ALAS subscales (Kourmousi et al 2017a). Although sex differences have not been sufficiently examined concerning the ability to actively empathically listen (Pence and James 2015), women have been reported by most researchers to dispose higher levels of empathy than men (Spreng et al 2009;Youssef et al 2014;Toussaint and Webb 2005;Kourmousi et al 2017b) due to their tendency to be more empathetic, pay closer attention to the speaker and the things said, and listen more effectively (Christov-Moore et al 2014;Rueckert and Naybar 2008;Rueckert et al 2011;Thompson and Voyer 2014). However, there are studies which have found no significant differences between males and females in empathy (e.g., Baldner and McGinley 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Women scored higher on Listening Skill and Conversation Opportunity, thus appearing to exhibit better listening attitudes and to be more eager to communicate. It could be hypothesized that female teachers scored higher than their male colleagues on ALAS, due to their tendency to be more empathetic, pay closer attention to the speaker and the things said, and listen more effectively [55][56][57][58][59]. More generally, adults' disparity between the sexes in terms of emotional socialization and their self-determination regarding the role of gender result in similar differences in social-emotional skills (e.g., [60,61]) and thus, consequently, in the communication and active listening skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women with schizophrenia (when compared to men) exhibit clinical features (less severe illness course, less severe negative symptoms, better overall functioning, better social skills) that are typically associated with better FEP performance. Further, healthy women are more accurate at FEP than healthy men [25][26][27] . This review will examine the literature on FEP in schizophrenia and summarize relevant findings related to sex differences in chronically ill adults with schizophrenia, people with early or recent-onset schizophrenia, and people at clinical high risk for developing schizophrenia (specifically, unaffected firstdegree relatives of people with schizophrenia).…”
Section: Mote J Et Al Facial Emotion Perception In Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the higher the percentage of male controls included in studies, the smaller the magnitude of group differences in FEP between controls and people with schizophrenia. The authors suggested that because healthy men perform worse on FEP than healthy women [27] , having more women in the control group may have boosted the overall control group mean, thus amplifying group differences between people with and without schizophrenia. Furthermore, because the percentage of men with schizophrenia did not significantly moderate the effect sizes in FEP, the authors concluded that men and women with schizophrenia performed similarly on FEP tasks.…”
Section: Adults With Chronic Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%