2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2010.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in tax compliance: Differentiating between demographic sex, gender-role orientation, and prenatal masculinization (2D:4D)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
112
1
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(59 reference statements)
9
112
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Croson and Gneezy (2008) show that the women are more risk averse than men, particularly in certain economical domains, and they are less involved than men in non-ethics behaviors. Kastlunger & al., (2010) suppose that women should expose higher levels of tax compliance. Nevertheless, the men should show important levels of tax evasion.…”
Section: Hypothesis 3: Duality Is Negatively Associated With Corporatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Croson and Gneezy (2008) show that the women are more risk averse than men, particularly in certain economical domains, and they are less involved than men in non-ethics behaviors. Kastlunger & al., (2010) suppose that women should expose higher levels of tax compliance. Nevertheless, the men should show important levels of tax evasion.…”
Section: Hypothesis 3: Duality Is Negatively Associated With Corporatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research on the tax behavior suggests that women do not cooperate in tax evasion strategies. (Kastlunger et al, 2010) According to the literature on the differences of risk taking behavior between the two genders and the tax compliance (Croson and Gneezy, (2009) ;Hasseldine, (1999), Kastlunger et al, (2010) suppose that women should expose higher levels of tax compliance. Yet, men should show important levels of tax evasion.…”
Section: Business Management and Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tendency of men for the tax evasion can be explained by several factors: the social differences that can be presented by the importance of gender in the orientation of the female and masculine concepts. Kastlunger et al, (2010) signal that differences between women and men can be generated, not only by the biological differences, but particularly by a set of characteristics linked to the gender (the feminine traits: the socially desirable behavior, kindness; the masculine traits: the dominance, the competitiveness and aggressiveness). These authors suggest that the differentiations between men and women can be detected at the level of the tax compliance and the strategies of payments of tax burdens.…”
Section: Business Management and Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male subjects evade more taxes than female subjects, which comports e.g. with Kastlunger et al (2010) or Bazart and Pickhardt (2011), and economics students are less compliant than others, as has been shown before by Cullis et al (2012). Tax evasion increases with decreasing risk aversion and risk aversion decreases with higher income-together, these effects lead to more tax evasion at higher incomes.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 57%