2021
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a039180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences in Spotted Hyenas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, male-biased power has often been implicitly considered as the default state, whereas female-biased power has traditionally been viewed as anecdotal and emerging from lineagespecific oddities [16,20], such as the 'lemur syndrome' or the peculiar anatomy of female genitalia in spotted hyenas, moving the topic outside mainstream socio-ecology. These oversimplifications, and the lack of a standardised methodology to quantify intersexual power, have prevented the conceptual integration of intersexual power into the broader evolutionary theories of sexual conflict and mating systems as well as comparative analyses that could reveal general mechanisms driving biases in intersexual power.…”
Section: The Main Conceptual and Methodological Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Third, male-biased power has often been implicitly considered as the default state, whereas female-biased power has traditionally been viewed as anecdotal and emerging from lineagespecific oddities [16,20], such as the 'lemur syndrome' or the peculiar anatomy of female genitalia in spotted hyenas, moving the topic outside mainstream socio-ecology. These oversimplifications, and the lack of a standardised methodology to quantify intersexual power, have prevented the conceptual integration of intersexual power into the broader evolutionary theories of sexual conflict and mating systems as well as comparative analyses that could reveal general mechanisms driving biases in intersexual power.…”
Section: The Main Conceptual and Methodological Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early empirical and theoretical studies of intersexual power have largely focused on the evolutionary drivers of female-biased power [12]. In the centre of attention were a handful of species where females were considered 'masculinised' because they possess behavioural, physiological or morpho-anatomical traits that are more strongly expressed among males in most mammals, such as large body size, aggressiveness, levels of androgens, or erectile external genitalia -as in many lemurs [13][14][15], spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) [16], rock hyraxes (Procavia capensis) [17], and meerkats (Suricata suricatta) [18]. A predominant set of hypotheses has therefore emphasised the role of intrinsic attributes on female coercive potential [12,15,19].…”
Section: The Historical Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations