2011
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.1116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in spatial ability: a test of the range size hypothesis in the order Carnivora

Abstract: Sex differences in spatial cognition have been reported for many species ranging from voles to humans. The range size hypothesis predicts that sex differences in spatial ability will only occur in species in which the mating system selects for differential range size. Consistent with this prediction, we observed sex differences in spatial ability in giant pandas, a promiscuous species in which males inhabit larger ranges than females, but did not observe sex differences in Asian small-clawed otters, a related … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
61
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(31 reference statements)
2
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The range size hypothesis predicts that species with a mating system that selects for a differential range size, such as a polygynous mating system, will show enhanced sex differences in spatial cognition compared to monogamous species in which the range size is equivalent [16,17,18]. Recent work with giant pandas and Asian small-clawed river otters supported the predictions within the order Carnivora [5]. Further research comparing different bear species should allow for additional insights into the origins of various cognitive abilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The range size hypothesis predicts that species with a mating system that selects for a differential range size, such as a polygynous mating system, will show enhanced sex differences in spatial cognition compared to monogamous species in which the range size is equivalent [16,17,18]. Recent work with giant pandas and Asian small-clawed river otters supported the predictions within the order Carnivora [5]. Further research comparing different bear species should allow for additional insights into the origins of various cognitive abilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, there is relatively little known about bear cognition. This has begun to change in recent years as more empirical studies have been carried out with giant pandas [2,3,4,5,6] and black bears [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This intersexual difference in physiology is based on the negative relationship between the male hormone, testosterone, and immune function, making males more susceptible to the majority of parasite infections (Klein 2004). Behavioral differences between genders are related to the greater mobility of males in systems with promiscuous mating, as the range of a female is generally associated with habitat quality, while the range of a male is associated with an improved probability of finding sexual partners (Püttker et al 2006;Fernandes et al 2010;Perdue et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Dungl, Schratter, and Huber (2008) demonstrated the ability of giant pandas to remember the reinforcement history of elliptical shapes after a period of six months to one year. Perdue and colleagues (Perdue, Snyder, Pratte, Marr, & Maple, 2009;Perdue, Synder, Zhihe, Marr, & Maple, 2011) have also demonstrated impressive memory capacity in giant pandas in a series of spatial memory tasks. Thus, it is clear that the bears' failure in our memory task is not due to a failure of memory per se but is a failure of our task itself, or a failure of the bears to abstract a general rule for test performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%