1989
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(89)90056-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in small-magnitude heart-rate responses to sexual and infant-related stimuli: A psychophysiological approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A further aspect that may contribute to the observed sex differences is women's role in childcare. In this context, there is evidence for a larger psychophysiological response to infant crying in women than in men [22]. Moreover, women have been found to identify emotional expressions in infants faster and more accurately than men [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A further aspect that may contribute to the observed sex differences is women's role in childcare. In this context, there is evidence for a larger psychophysiological response to infant crying in women than in men [22]. Moreover, women have been found to identify emotional expressions in infants faster and more accurately than men [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, this early detection in brainstem regions might support initiation of a state of heightened physiological arousal upon detection of infant cues. Peripheral psychophysiological studies have demonstrated that hearing infant cries can impact the listener's heart rate, respiration and hand grip strength [although the direction of these effects varies across studies; [72,[73][74][75][76][77]]. It is hypothesised that heightened physiological arousal aids the initiation of rapid, effortful caregiving behaviour.…”
Section: Early Detection Of Infant Vocalisations In the Brainstemmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Montoya et al [63] Ranote et al [64] Barrett et al [65] Strathearn et al [66] STS/G Kim et al [60] Lorberbaum et al [61] Mascaro et al [67] Bos et al [68] Riem et al [62] Montoya et al [63] Montoya et al [63] Ranote et al [64] Noriuchi et al [69] Barrett et al [65] Bartels and Zeki [70] Strathearn et al [66] FFG -Caria et al [71] Bartels and Zeki [70] Nitschke et al [72] Strathearn et al [66] Frontal lobe OFC Laurent et al [73] Mascaro et al [67] Baeken et al [74] Glocker et al [29] Leibenluft et al [75] Montoya et al [63] Nitschke et al [72] Ranote et al [64] Strathearn et al [66] Bartels and Zeki [70] Noriuchi et al [ …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the auditory domain, women and men are similar in their explicit appraisal of infant vocalisations, reporting similar levels of perceived distress and desire to respond (Donate-Bartfield and Passman, 1985 ; Leger et al, 1996 ; Parsons et al, 2014b , c ). There is mixed evidence on whether there are gender differences in physiological reactions to infant cries, with findings demonstrating greater reactivity in women than men (Wiesenfeld et al, 1981 ; Furedy et al, 1989 ) or greater reactivity in men than women (Brewster et al, 1998 ; Out et al, 2010 ). One study to date assessing motivational salience of infant cries demonstrated no gender differences (Parsons et al, 2012a ).…”
Section: Parent-infant Interactions As a Model Of Affective Social Fumentioning
confidence: 99%