Sex Differences in Neural Networks Recruited by Frontloaded Binge Alcohol Drinking

Abstract

Frontloading is an alcohol drinking pattern where intake is skewed toward the onset of access. The goal of the current study was to identify brain regions involved in frontloading. Whole brain imaging was performed in 63 C57Bl/6J (32 female and 31 male) mice that underwent 8 days of binge drinking using the drinking-in-the-dark (DID) model. On days 1-7, three hours into the dark cycle, mice received 20% (v/v) alcohol or water for two hours. Intake was measured in 1-minute bins using volumetric sippers, which facilitated analyses of drinking patterns. On day 8 mice were perfused 80 minutes into the DID session and brains were extracted. Brains were then processed to stain for Fos protein using iDISCO+. Following light sheet imaging, ClearMap2.1 was used to register brains to the Allen Brain Atlas and detect Fos+ cells. For brain network analyses, day 8 drinking patterns were used to characterize mice as frontloaders or non-frontloaders using a recently developed change-point analysis. Based on this analysis the groups were female frontloaders (n = 20), female non-frontloaders (n = 2), male frontloaders (n = 13) and male non-frontloaders (n = 8). There were no differences in total alcohol intake in animals that frontloaded versus those that did not. Only two female mice were characterized as non-frontloaders, thus preventing brain network analysis of this group. Functional correlation matrices were calculated for each group from log10 Fos values. Euclidean distances were calculated from these R values and hierarchical clustering was used to determine modules (highly connected groups of brain regions). In males, alcohol access decreased modularity (3 modules in both frontloaders and non-frontloaders) as compared to water drinkers (7 modules). In females, an opposite effect was observed. Alcohol access (9 modules for frontloaders) increased modularity as compared to water drinkers (5 modules). These results suggest sex differences in how alcohol consumption reorganizes the functional architecture of neural networks. Next, key brain regions in each network were identified. Connector hubs, which primarily facilitate communication between modules, and provincial hubs, which facilitate communication within modules, were of specific interest for their important and differing roles. In males, 4 connector hubs and 17 provincial hubs were uniquely identified in frontloaders (i.e., were brain regions that did not have this status in male non-frontloaders or water drinkers). These represented a group of hindbrain regions (e.g., locus coeruleus and the pontine gray) functionally connected to striatal/cortical regions (e.g., cortical amygdalar area) by the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus. In females, 16 connector and 17 provincial hubs were uniquely identified which were distributed across 8 of the 9 modules in the female frontloader alcohol drinker network. Only one brain region (the nucleus raphe pontis) was a connector hub in both sexes, suggesting that frontloading in males and females may be driven by different brain regions. In conclusion, alcohol consumption led to fewer, but more densely connected, groups of brain regions in males but not females, and recruited different hub brain regions between the sexes. These results suggest that alcohol frontloading leads to a reduction in network efficiency in male mice.

Escalation of intravenous fentanyl self-administration and assessment of withdrawal behavior in male and female mice

“…Interestingly, in this study, mice were found to take more fentanyl during the first 30 minutes of the two-hour session than other portions of the session, implying front-loading behavior. Front-loading behavior, which refers to the rapid consumption of a drug at the beginning of a self-administration session, has been more investigated in alcohol drinking (41–43). In the present study, the “loading” phase observed within the first 30 minutes may indicate an increased drug intake due to the emergence of negative emotional-like states associated with withdrawal.…”