2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in implicit motor imagery: Evidence from the hand laterality task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study explored whether and how the extent of participants' autistic traits and body appreciation affect the performance of implicit and explicit hand recognition tasks in a TD population, divided by sex (cf. Mochizuki et al, 2019;Conson et al, 2020). In addition, we investigated whether the results of visual recognition tasks (i.e., laterality judgment and self-other discrimination tasks) in previous studies (e.g., Ferri et al, 2011;Conson et al, 2015) would be replicated, even if the number of orientation conditions of the hand image was limited to two (i.e., upright and upside-down).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The present study explored whether and how the extent of participants' autistic traits and body appreciation affect the performance of implicit and explicit hand recognition tasks in a TD population, divided by sex (cf. Mochizuki et al, 2019;Conson et al, 2020). In addition, we investigated whether the results of visual recognition tasks (i.e., laterality judgment and self-other discrimination tasks) in previous studies (e.g., Ferri et al, 2011;Conson et al, 2015) would be replicated, even if the number of orientation conditions of the hand image was limited to two (i.e., upright and upside-down).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Specifically, longer RTs for hand laterality judgments were shown when participants were holding both hands behind their back than when the same task was performed with both hands placed on their knees. The biomechanical effect is stronger when the hands were presented from palm than from back, because physically rotating palms is assumed to be more difficult than rotating backs of hands (Sekiyama, 1982;Parsons, 1987Parsons, , 1994Gentilucci et al, 1998;ter Horst et al, 2010;Bläsing et al, 2013;Zapparoli et al, 2014;Conson et al, 2020). These results indicate that hand laterality judgment tasks involve implicit motor imagery processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It requires participants to decide whether a visually presented stimulus in a given angular orientation portrays a left or a right hand [19,20]. Both classical and recent studies have demonstrated that this task implies the automatic activation of mental simulation of actions (i.e., motor imagery) [19][20][21], but several studies have shown that visual imagery can be recruited too when people make hand laterality judgments [22][23][24][25][26]. A fine-grain analysis of task performance can reveal differences between visual and motor strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%