1975
DOI: 10.1038/253438a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in imagery and reading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most influential studies (Corcoran, 1966) demonstrated that subjects searching for instances of the letter e in printed text made more errors on words in which e was silent (as in the word time) than on words in which it was pronounced (as in the word well). The common interpretation of this result, also observed by other investigators (e.g., Chen, 1976;Coltheart, Hull, & Slater, 1975;Locke, 1978;Mohan, 1978), is that subjects silently reading paragraphs of text scan the acoustic image of a word along with the visual stimulus. However, in normal English prose of the type used by Corcoran, & Groat, 1979), in frequent words (Healy, 1976(Healy, , 1980, in function words (Drewnowski & Healy, 1977;Schindler, 1978), and in some morpheme suffixes (Drewnowski & Healy, 1980).…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most influential studies (Corcoran, 1966) demonstrated that subjects searching for instances of the letter e in printed text made more errors on words in which e was silent (as in the word time) than on words in which it was pronounced (as in the word well). The common interpretation of this result, also observed by other investigators (e.g., Chen, 1976;Coltheart, Hull, & Slater, 1975;Locke, 1978;Mohan, 1978), is that subjects silently reading paragraphs of text scan the acoustic image of a word along with the visual stimulus. However, in normal English prose of the type used by Corcoran, & Groat, 1979), in frequent words (Healy, 1976(Healy, , 1980, in function words (Drewnowski & Healy, 1977;Schindler, 1978), and in some morpheme suffixes (Drewnowski & Healy, 1980).…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…In our previous studies, we have used the letter-detection technique to examine the size of the units employed in reading printed text. In contrast, most investigators using this technique have focused on the phonetic recoding hypothesis, by comparing error rates either on silent and pronounced letters (Chen, 1976;Coltheart et al, 1975;Corcoran, 1966;Mohan, 1978;Smith & Groat, 1979) or on modal and nonmodal phonemes (Locke, 1978). However, the use of normal English in this task carries with it important confoundings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was a trend toward the interaction of Type of Task by Sex [F(1,18) = 3.01, p<.10], previously reported by. Coltheart, Hull, and Slater (1975). The total discrepancy between the correct and the judged numbers of letters for males was 131 on the graphemic task and 171 on the phonemic task, whereas the females' figures were 116 and 106, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We asked subjects to state from memory whether uppercase letters named by the examiner contained any curved lines [14]. All the letters of the French alphabet were presented.…”
Section: Uppercase Letter Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%