2022
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences in Glioblastoma—Findings from the Swedish National Quality Registry for Primary Brain Tumors between 1999–2018

Abstract: Sex disparities in glioblastoma (GBM) have received increasing attention. Sex-related differences for several molecular markers have been reported, which could impact on clinical factors and outcomes. We therefore analyzed data on all patients with GBM reported to the Swedish National Quality Registry for Primary Brain Tumors, according to sex, with a focus on prognostic factors and survival. All glioma patients registered during 20 years, from 1 January 1999 until 31 December 2018, with SNOMED codes 94403, 94… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, sex was also significantly associated with patient survival in specific molecular groups in our cohort, e.g., GBM-IDHwt. To our knowledge, this study is the first to reveal the prognostic role of sex in a Chinese cohort, although similar results have been reported in Western cohorts 56 59 . Several explanations have been suggested, including hormone rhythms, lifestyle, psychological status, and genetic inheritance 60 , 61 , and women appear to have a stronger protective response against DGs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Interestingly, sex was also significantly associated with patient survival in specific molecular groups in our cohort, e.g., GBM-IDHwt. To our knowledge, this study is the first to reveal the prognostic role of sex in a Chinese cohort, although similar results have been reported in Western cohorts 56 59 . Several explanations have been suggested, including hormone rhythms, lifestyle, psychological status, and genetic inheritance 60 , 61 , and women appear to have a stronger protective response against DGs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, similar to retrospective studies in larger trials, there are limited reports on gender differences [ 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. Nonetheless, some large retrospective cohorts did identify sex-specific differences of note ( Table 3 ) [ 6 , 7 , 10 , 49 ]. This leads to further examination of data embedded in large-scale data sets, as discussed in the following section.…”
Section: Examining Prospective and Retrospective Literature Regarding...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For women with radical surgery, overall survival was improved. However, a survival advantage for women was no longer statistically significant in multivariate analysis, including of sex, age, surgery, and performance status [ 10 ]. Intersectionality with age is revealed in several studies, including in a recent analysis of brainstem tumors from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2018 [ 6 ], which revealed that, in younger patients, females had a higher age-adjusted mortality rate compared to males, with the reverse trend noted in older patients.…”
Section: Large-scale Data Sets and Male/female Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is also reported intersectionality between age and gender and between these clinical features and molecular markers with GFAP, EMA, MGMT, P53, NeuN, Oligo2, EGFR, VEGF, IDH1, Ki-67, PR, CD3, H3K27M, TS, and 1p/19q status included in the age group classification by Lin et al 2020 [ 55 ]. Gender-related prognosis differences and associated molecular features support connections to outcomes [ 57 , 58 ]. Molecular differences associated with gender were reported for XIST, PUDP, ZFX, JPX, KDM6A, and TSIX in females and PRKY, RPS4Y2, PCDH11Y, EIF1AY, RPS4Y1, and ZFY in males when the analysis was carried out on GBM and LGG [ 58 ].…”
Section: Clinical and Management Features Of Significance In Gliomamentioning
confidence: 99%