2002
DOI: 10.1076/jcen.24.1.107.970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences in Episodic Memory: The Influence of Intelligence

Abstract: The influence of estimated intelligence (group assessment of WAIS-R( S)) on sex differences in face recognition, as well as verbal and non-verbal episodic memory tasks was examined in 99 women and 88 men between 20 and 40 years of age. Results showed that men performed at a higher level than women on the WAIS-R(S) subtest Information, whereas the opposite was true for Digit symbol. Women performed at a higher level than men on the verbal episodic memory tasks and on face recognition, but there were no sex diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
70
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
70
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Such results converge with previous findings that have shown better performance for females in episodic memory tasks (Herlitz et al, 1999;Herlitz & Yonker, 2002). Although this benefit was observed for both age groups, the benefit in memory performance for females over males was more consistently observed in the older adult sample.…”
Section: Itemsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Such results converge with previous findings that have shown better performance for females in episodic memory tasks (Herlitz et al, 1999;Herlitz & Yonker, 2002). Although this benefit was observed for both age groups, the benefit in memory performance for females over males was more consistently observed in the older adult sample.…”
Section: Itemsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Previous studies with young and older adults suggested a benefit for women in verbal episodic memory, as well as a comparable benefit for men in the visuospatial domain (see Herlitz, Airaksinen, & Nordstrom, 1999;Herlitz, Nilsson, & Backman, 1997;Herlitz & Rehnman, 2008;Lewin et al 2001). The memory benefit for verbal materials observed in women over men was confirmed in a study by Herlitz and Yonker (2002), who tested young adult men and women in a series of tasks involving the recall and recognition of verbal material, faces, and abstract pictorial stimuli. Their results showed that, regardless of intelligence (measured by the WAIS-R), women outperformed men on memory of verbal materials and showed a slight benefit in memory for faces.…”
Section: Gender Differences In Episodic Memorymentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Evidence of an increased factual orientation for males has been observed outside the autobiographical memory literature, as well. Although women tend to have better episodic memories, in general, (Herlitz & Yonker, 2002), men tend to perform better than women on some but not all tests of general knowledge (see Rubin, Schulkind, & Rahhal, 1999, for a review). The present experiment also yielded interesting data regarding how males and females relate personal successes and failures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recollection of a specific action to perform (retrospective component) is likely mediated by the episodic memory system, which is also responsible for the memorization of previous experiences (Kvavilashvili, 1987;Carlesimo, Casadio, & Caltagirone, 2004). Thus, one should expect to find a female advantage in prospective memory tasks due to the better episodic memory reported in women (Bloise & Johnson, 2007;Herlitz, Airaksinen, & Nordström, 1999;Herlitz, & Yonker, 2002). But, considering that successful performance on a prospective memory task also requires other processes, such as monitoring the environment to detect the prospective memory cue and/or checking the passing of time, a male advantage in these other processes (Ceci & Bronfenbrenner, 1985) might balance the female advantage for retrospective memory, resulting in the absence of gender differences on a prospective memory task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%