2022
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.905351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences in Epicardial Adipose Tissue: Association With Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes

Abstract: BackgroundThere are significant differences in the prevalence and prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) between sexes. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) has been found as a risk factor for AF. This study aimed to evaluate whether sex-based EAT differences were correlated with AF recurrence and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).MethodsIn this study, postmenopausal women and age, BMI, and type of AF matched men who had received first catheter ablation were included. EAT volume was quantified based on the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emergence of automatic segmentation models based on CT angiography and CACS scans has significantly advanced research on the relationship between EAT and cardiovascular adverse events, such as myocardial infarction ( 10 , 11 , 26 , 27 ). However, the investigation into the association between EAT and AF still lacks validation from large-scale cohorts ( 16 , 28 , 29 ). This discrepancy can be attributed to the limitations of existing EAT segmentation models when applied to scans from PCTV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of automatic segmentation models based on CT angiography and CACS scans has significantly advanced research on the relationship between EAT and cardiovascular adverse events, such as myocardial infarction ( 10 , 11 , 26 , 27 ). However, the investigation into the association between EAT and AF still lacks validation from large-scale cohorts ( 16 , 28 , 29 ). This discrepancy can be attributed to the limitations of existing EAT segmentation models when applied to scans from PCTV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%