2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in effects of tDCS and language treatments on brain functional connectivity in primary progressive aphasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and conducted following the Helsinki Declaration on human research ethics. We decided to include only women in order to have a more homogeneous sample, as there are differences between sexes in terms of neuromodulation [ 34 ], which impact the tDCS-induced electric field on the target area for different montages and current intensities [ 33 ], resulting in different changes in corticospinal excitability [ 35 ], functional connectivity [ 36 ], and clinical findings [ 32 , 37 ] between men and women.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and conducted following the Helsinki Declaration on human research ethics. We decided to include only women in order to have a more homogeneous sample, as there are differences between sexes in terms of neuromodulation [ 34 ], which impact the tDCS-induced electric field on the target area for different montages and current intensities [ 33 ], resulting in different changes in corticospinal excitability [ 35 ], functional connectivity [ 36 ], and clinical findings [ 32 , 37 ] between men and women.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that most of recent studies in this field have been conducted on male participants, showing the necessity of conducting research studies on female participants [32][33][34]. This is important, considering the differences between sexes, with implications for neuromodulation [34], which results in differences between men and women in tDCS-induced electric field, on the target area; for different montages and current intensities [33], changes in corticospinal excitability [35], functional connectivity [36], and clinical findings [32,37]. Therefore, based on the dearth of information regarding the effectiveness of tDCS in sports referees' decision-making performance-in particular female sports referees-and sex-related implications for neuromodulation techniques, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of tDCS applied over the right DLPFC area on the decision making, impulsivity, and reaction time of female team sports referees.…”
Section: General Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation