1990
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90047-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in aversive and appetitive conditioning in two strains of rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A. Gray & Lalljee, 1974;Weinberg, Gunnar, Brett, Gonzalez, & Levine, 1982), lower latencies to respond to the shock in the avoidance-learning paradigm in females (Lehmann, Pryce, & Feldon, 1999;Saavedra, Abarca, Arancibia, & Salinas, 1990), and a decreased time to complete 25 licks after stimulus onset in the CER experiment in females (Heinsbroek, Van Haaren, & Van De Poll, 1988). This high degree of consistency with other reports in the literature, together with the finding of a robust LI effect across all three paradigms, provides a robust validation of the present study and the methodology used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A. Gray & Lalljee, 1974;Weinberg, Gunnar, Brett, Gonzalez, & Levine, 1982), lower latencies to respond to the shock in the avoidance-learning paradigm in females (Lehmann, Pryce, & Feldon, 1999;Saavedra, Abarca, Arancibia, & Salinas, 1990), and a decreased time to complete 25 licks after stimulus onset in the CER experiment in females (Heinsbroek, Van Haaren, & Van De Poll, 1988). This high degree of consistency with other reports in the literature, together with the finding of a robust LI effect across all three paradigms, provides a robust validation of the present study and the methodology used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It is possible that, even when the to-be-avoided event is merely cognitive feedback, females may be more motivated to avoid this event. On the other hand, there is a large body of literature suggesting that females may simply be faster to acquire associations, not only in active avoidance paradigms but also in classical conditioning (Shors et al 1998; Spence and Spence 1966; Wood and Shors 1998) and appetitive conditioning (Dreher et al 2007; Lynch 2008; Saavedra et al 1990), and such a tendency could also produce faster learning by females in the current task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It should also be noted that the models of the acquisition of a pain stimulus avoidance reaction used here differ in the level of difficulty [23]. In the case of the one-way avoidance reaction, the "dangerous" (mesh floor) and "safe" (shelf) parts of the experimental chamber were consistent during the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%