2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in arithmetical performance scores: Central tendency and variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it is recommended to study the influence of biological factors, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status in this context. Recent findings suggest that psychosocial environment (e.g., socioeconomic background) and biological factors (e.g., sex) may cause interindividual differences in patterns of cognitive development and academic functioning (e.g., Hurks et al, 2006; Martens, Hurks, Meijs, Wassenberg, & Jolles, 2011; Rietveld, Dolan, Van Baal, & Boomsma, 2003). Also, cultural psychologists have consistently found different patterns of thinking and perception in different societies, with Western cultures demonstrating a more analytic pattern and others (e.g., East Asians) a more holistic pattern (Varnum, Grossmann, Kitayama, & Nisbett, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is recommended to study the influence of biological factors, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status in this context. Recent findings suggest that psychosocial environment (e.g., socioeconomic background) and biological factors (e.g., sex) may cause interindividual differences in patterns of cognitive development and academic functioning (e.g., Hurks et al, 2006; Martens, Hurks, Meijs, Wassenberg, & Jolles, 2011; Rietveld, Dolan, Van Baal, & Boomsma, 2003). Also, cultural psychologists have consistently found different patterns of thinking and perception in different societies, with Western cultures demonstrating a more analytic pattern and others (e.g., East Asians) a more holistic pattern (Varnum, Grossmann, Kitayama, & Nisbett, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, although multiple studies have investigated gender as moderator on mathematical competency, the overall results are mixed. Some have found slight advantages for male students within distinct mathematical skills (Royer, Tronsky, Jackson, & Horace Marchant, 1999), in use of abstract strategy use (Fennema, Carpenter, Franke, & Levi, 1998), or at higher grades (Martens, Hurks, Meijs, Wassenberg, & Jolles, 2011). As this analysis considers the sample at first grade and signals a change in the expectations and content associated with mathematics instruction in traditional elementary schools, the current analysis sought to capture any developing differences in mathematical competencies across gender.…”
Section: Present Study—analyses Of Effects In First Gradementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex is well known for its influence on school performance, as girls and boys excel at different subjects (Machin, 2005 ; Van Langen et al, 2006 ; Clark et al, 2008 ; Driessen and Van Langen, 2010 ). There is also growing evidence to support the conclusion that the neuropsychological performance of boys and girls differs in the school setting (Martens et al, 2011 ; Dekker et al, 2013a ). In addition, a recent study has reported differences in executive functioning related to school performance in adolescents of different sex (Coenen et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%