Sex Differences in Anxiety and Depression: What Can (and Cannot) Preclinical Studies Tell Us?

Abstract

In recent years, the gender perspective in scientific research and sex differences in biological studies on emotional disorders have become increasingly important. However, sex bias in basic research on anxiety and depression is still far from being covered. This review addresses the study of sex differences in the field of anxiety and depression using animal models that consider this issue so far. What can preclinical studies tell us and what are their main limitations? First, we describe the behavioral tests most frequently used in preclinical research to assess depressive-like and anxiety-like behaviors in rodents. Then, we analyze the main findings, strengths, and weaknesses of rodent models of anxiety and depression, dividing them into three main categories: sex chromosome complement-biased sex differences; gonadal hormone-biased sex differences; environmental-biased sex differences. Regardless of the animal model used, none can reproduce all the characteristics of such complex and multifactorial pathologies as anxiety and depressive disorders; however, each animal model contributes to elucidating the bases that underlie these disorders. The importance is highlighted of considering sex differences in the responses that emerge from each model.

Dynamics and immunomodulation of cognitive deficits and behavioral changes in non-severe experimental malaria

“…Anxiety-related parameters were evaluated after nSEM treatment in two different tests (OFT and LDT) in INF groups from all cohorts. Among the predictive behavioral tests to explore anxiety-like behavior, the LDT is considered a robust test to assess this complex phenotype in rodent ( 41 ), and the time spent in the light compartment is the main predictive parameter used in most studies in the literature, instead of the number of transitions ( 42 ). In this sense, increases in time spent in the light zone by INF groups have been observed here in all three cohorts in LDT.…”

Ethical Implications in Making Use of Human Cerebral Organoids for Investigating Stress—Related Mechanisms and Disorders

“…Given the fact that animals unlike organoids are also social beings, stress models in animals do also cover social forms of stress such as early maternal separation, social defeat, social isolation, chronic unpredictable stress, or forms of learned helplessness. 78 The nature of the stressor is also of interest here, while in vitro stressors relevant to stress-related disorders are mainly of a chemical nature, in chimeric animals of cerebral organoids, this limit is no longer needed and stressors theoretically could include chemical, physical, and psychosocial features. The use of animals for stress experiments is itself an ethical concern due to the harm and discomfort to which these animals are subjected.…”

Parental enriched environment: A look through key temporary windows

“…Sexual differentiation of the brain is a complex process, acting in restricted temporal windows that include the perinatal period. Genetic, hormonal, and environmental variables interact with each other, and have been implicated in sex differences in neurobehavioral outcomes 53 . Conducting more and better research on the effects of maternal pregestational EE on neurodevelopmental trajectories will provide stronger evidence on this issue.…”