2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-62619-6.00016-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in alcohol-related neurobehavioral consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
1
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, relative to their pre-alcohol assessments, women have shown greater performance decrements than men on tasks of short-term memory (Niaura, Nathan, Frankenstein, Shapiro, & Brick, 1987) and divided attention (Mumenthaler et al, 1999). Although much of the literature suggests that women may be more susceptible to the effects of acute alcohol relative to men (e.g., Miller et al, 2009), this finding was not supported by the current study (see also Friedman, Robinson, & Yelland, 2011; Nixon, Prather, & Lewis, 2014; Weissenborn & Duka, 2003). Thus, the effects of sex and acute alcohol may differ with age.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…For example, relative to their pre-alcohol assessments, women have shown greater performance decrements than men on tasks of short-term memory (Niaura, Nathan, Frankenstein, Shapiro, & Brick, 1987) and divided attention (Mumenthaler et al, 1999). Although much of the literature suggests that women may be more susceptible to the effects of acute alcohol relative to men (e.g., Miller et al, 2009), this finding was not supported by the current study (see also Friedman, Robinson, & Yelland, 2011; Nixon, Prather, & Lewis, 2014; Weissenborn & Duka, 2003). Thus, the effects of sex and acute alcohol may differ with age.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…This finding is congruent with previous alcohol use research (see NIAAA, 2016;Wilsnack, Vogeltanz, Wilsnack, & Harris, 2000) as well as CEBRACS research (Rahal at el., 2012). However, men reported greater alcohol frequency and dependence while women reported higher scores on the alcohol problems subscale of the AUDIT which is also congruent with past research (Hoffman, Sklar, & Nixon, 2015;Nixon, Prather, & Lewis, 2014). It was originally hypothesized that women might exhibit more compensatory behaviors in relation to alcohol consumption even if the frequency with which both genders consume alcohol is not significantly different from one another because women have a greater historical prevalence of disordered eating habits when compared to men (see Fattore, Melis, Fadda, & Fratta, 2014 for review).…”
Section: Hypothesissupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Due to differences in body mass composition, as well as other still unknown factors, women are more susceptible to the harmful effects of alcohol than men, as reflected by the lower alcohol consumption recommendations for women vs. men provided by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Sex differences in alcohol-induced brain damage and cognitive impairment have rarely been addressed in clinical studies, and a consensus of whether increased damage or dysfunction is observed in women is lacking (reviewed in Nixon et al, 2014). In general, studies suggest that women exhibit brain damage with less total alcohol consumption, or more damage with similar levels of intake than men, though not all studies have observed this phenomenon (Hommer, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%