2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2019.8857296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Difference in EEG Functional Connectivity during Sleep Stages and Resting Wake State Based on Weighted Phase Lag Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been many previous exploratory studies using gender as a variable, for example, in a study in which the weighted phase lag index of sleep EEG reflected the functional brain connectivity of people of different genders, the results responded to significantly greater connectivity in female than in male in the high sigma frequency range, but the opposite pattern was observed in the alpha, low sigma, and beta frequency ranges ( 69 ). Another study using the same index calculation noted that synchronization strength showed significant gender differences in all stages and bands, being higher in females during the NREM stage and higher in males during the W and REM stages in the alpha and beta bands ( 70 ). All of these findings suggest differences in functional connectivity for sleep staging by gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been many previous exploratory studies using gender as a variable, for example, in a study in which the weighted phase lag index of sleep EEG reflected the functional brain connectivity of people of different genders, the results responded to significantly greater connectivity in female than in male in the high sigma frequency range, but the opposite pattern was observed in the alpha, low sigma, and beta frequency ranges ( 69 ). Another study using the same index calculation noted that synchronization strength showed significant gender differences in all stages and bands, being higher in females during the NREM stage and higher in males during the W and REM stages in the alpha and beta bands ( 70 ). All of these findings suggest differences in functional connectivity for sleep staging by gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In a previous EEG study exploring differences in brain function between adults and older adults, the SVM classifier was used with 93% accuracy when categorizing the brain by age group ( 52 ). Another study found gender differences in EEG functional connectivity between sleep stages and resting wake states based on weighted phase lag indices ( 70 ). This coincides with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muñoz-Torres [32] adopted the average power spectral density as an indicator to compare the difference among subjects with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and found that OSA men displayed decreased power of a large frequency range (sigma, beta, and gamma) during sleep compared with women. Liao [33] compared the synchronization intensities during the resting wakeful stage EEG, which showed significant gender differences in all stages and bands: higher in women in non-rapid eye movement sleep, and higher in men in α and β bands in the wakeful stage and REM sleep. However, our result showed no difference by using the WLMF method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase synchronization is a category that focuses on the phase coupling of oscillation systems. The phase locking value (PLV; Bajo et al, 2015; Bedo, Ribary, & Ward, 2020; Delgado‐Restituto, Romaine, & Rodríguez‐Vázquez, 2019; Mheich, Hassan, Khalil, Berrou, & Wendling, 2015; Sadaghiani & Kleinschmidt, 2016) and the phase lag index (PLI; Chaturvedi et al, 2019; Fraga González et al, 2018; Liao, Zhou, & Luo, 2019; Stam et al, 2007) are high‐frequently used to obtain the strength of phase synchronization. Information theory is regarded as another efficient method in the case of extracting nonlinear interactions among EEG signals.…”
Section: Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%