2019
DOI: 10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_7_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex determination using mandibular canine among Northeastern Nigerian population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study revealed significant gender dimorphism in the MD width and ICD of the maxillary canines, with males showing larger corresponding mean values than females, which was in accordance with previous studies [24,30,31]. The results of gender dimorphism of the maxillary canine in the present study showed a greater dimorphism in the MD width of the right canine (3.5%), followed by ICD (3.14%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study revealed significant gender dimorphism in the MD width and ICD of the maxillary canines, with males showing larger corresponding mean values than females, which was in accordance with previous studies [24,30,31]. The results of gender dimorphism of the maxillary canine in the present study showed a greater dimorphism in the MD width of the right canine (3.5%), followed by ICD (3.14%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Contrary to this, a previous study among the Saudi population had reported no statistically significant differences in the mean MD width of right and left maxillary canines between the genders [16]. Another study in Nigeria, however, had reported that the MD width of the left maxillary canine was significantly higher in males than in females [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It should be noted that there is also an MCI using the same measurements except in the upper dentition (Bakkannavar et al, 2015;Nuhu et al, 2019;Otuagn et al, 2019;Phulari et al, 2017;Rani, 2017). In previous studies, it was found that the Maxillary Index results were not as significant as the Mandibular Index ones and thus not as accurate at assessing sex within the Indian populations (Nuhu et al, 2019;Otuagna et al, 2019). Other studies found that the Maxillary Canine Index was not significant at all and should not be used as a sexing method (Bakkannavar et al, 2015;Phulari et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They validated the MCI on a population from Nice, France and concluded that correct tooth alignment within the alveolus is important and that a standard MCI needed to be calculated for each population. More recently, standard MCI has also been calculated for Nigerian populations (Nuhu et al, 2019;Otuahn et al, 2019), Pakistani populations (Hassan & Meman, 2018;Hussain et al, 2012;Shahid et al, 2018), Nepali populations (Acharya & Mainali, 2007Bajracharya et al, 2018;), a Chinese population (Iqbal et al, 2015); a Bosnian population (Muhanedagic & Sarjic, 2013), a Brazilian population (Sassi et al,2012 ), an Iraqi population (Ahmed et al, 2014) and a British population (Hussain et al, 2012; Table 1). A meta-analysis performed in 2018 found at least 26 studies utilizing the MCI between 2000 and 2016 (Dony et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though in many aspects, teeth or the arch pattern of the male and female are similar; they still possess some differences which help to determine their gender. Literature showed numerous studies for gender identification of the individuals by using several hard and soft oral tissues and methods such as; rugoscopy 1,2 , cheiloscopy 3,4 , palatal depth 5,6 , inter-canine width 7,8 , inter-molar width 9,10 , and mandibular canine index [11][12][13] etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%