2016
DOI: 10.4103/0972-1363.189990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex determination of human mandible using metrical parameters by computed tomography: A prospective radiographic short study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed that bigonial breadth (BgBr) was 72.9±5.6 mm in males and 72.6±5.2 mm in females, however, the difference was not significant. Kallali et al, 10 found 70.9 mm in males and 70.4 mm in females. The mean±SD minimal ramus breadth (M-R-Br) in males was 31.2±1.2 mm and in females was 24.6±0.9 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We observed that bigonial breadth (BgBr) was 72.9±5.6 mm in males and 72.6±5.2 mm in females, however, the difference was not significant. Kallali et al, 10 found 70.9 mm in males and 70.4 mm in females. The mean±SD minimal ramus breadth (M-R-Br) in males was 31.2±1.2 mm and in females was 24.6±0.9 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We found that the mean Gonial Angle (Go-ang) was 112.6±3.4 mm in males and 122.4±4.2 mm in females. Kalllali et al, 10 found that the Gonial Angle was higher in females (120.4 0 ) as compared to males (114.7 0 ). Elsalam et al, 11 found that the Gonial Angle was 138.3° in males and 140.9° in females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12, 15 Kharoshah et al (2010) conducted a study for analysing the sexual dimorphism in mandible by 3D-CT in 2010 by taking the different mandibular parameters in this study and concluded that BIC-Br, G-angle, and minimal Ramus-L have significant sexual dimorphism with overall accuracy of 83.9%, however, their study showed significant statistical difference with the G-angle, Ramus-L, G-G-L, BIC-Br, and CO-L (P < 0.05) with overall accuracy of 84%. 8,14 Dayal et al (2008) reported the assessment of sex using 120 skulls, using 6 mandibular measurements, and the application of discriminant function analysis and had an average accuracy of 85%. The study concludes that the stepwise feature discriminant analysis could identify the gonial angle and ramus length, gonion-gnathion length and bigonial breadth as final predictors of sex determination with overall predictive accuracy of 83.2% as the best predictor of sex dimorphism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed tomography scan is an imaging procedure that produces multiple images according to different tissue structure (Liguori et al, 2015). CT is a useful imaging method which can be used in the process of human identification and has multiple advantages as compared to traditional radiographic methods (Kallalli et al, 2016). Therefore, this study aimed to determine forensic sex using sacrum and coccyx CT on a sample of Libyan population in Benghazi through measuring ASL, PSL, ASCL, PSCL, ASW, CLS, LAS, MDB and MTDB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%