2017
DOI: 10.15713/ins.jmrps.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex determination by using mandibular ramus: A digital radiographic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean minimum ramus breadth in males and females (28.89 mm and 27.49 mm) in the present study is lesser than that of the study done by Vodanovic on Croatians (31.26 mm in males and 28.36 mm in females) [10], N. Ongkana on Thais (32.8 mm in males and 31.4 mm in females) [7] and and lesser than values obtained by Tejavathi Nagaraj et al (33.50 mm in males and 32.63 mm in females) [8]. In all these studies it was observed that the minimum ramus breadth is greater in males than the females and the differences were highly significant (p<0.01) on statistical analysis.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean minimum ramus breadth in males and females (28.89 mm and 27.49 mm) in the present study is lesser than that of the study done by Vodanovic on Croatians (31.26 mm in males and 28.36 mm in females) [10], N. Ongkana on Thais (32.8 mm in males and 31.4 mm in females) [7] and and lesser than values obtained by Tejavathi Nagaraj et al (33.50 mm in males and 32.63 mm in females) [8]. In all these studies it was observed that the minimum ramus breadth is greater in males than the females and the differences were highly significant (p<0.01) on statistical analysis.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…It was been observed that the maximum ramus breadth in males was 1.63 mm broader than that of the females and the differences were statistically very highly significant (p= 0.000). [Table 1] The mean maximum ramus breadth of males and females (35.82 mm and 34.17 mm) in the present study is lesser than the values obtained by Vodanovic M on Croatian mandibles (44.20 mm in males and 41.23 mm in females) [10] and lesser than values obtained by Tejavathi Nagaraj et al (40.55 mm in males and 39.44 in females) [8]. In all these studies it was observed that, the maximum ramus breadth is greater in males than in females and the differences were very highly significant (p<0.001) on statistical analysis.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,6 However other studies have also reported different parameters to be dimorphic such as; condylar height, coronoid height, minimum ramus breadth. 3,13,14,[17][18][19] Humphrey et al pointed out that the mandibular ramus and condyle are the sites that undergo the most morphological changes in size and remodeling during development, making them the most dimorphic. 16 In our study, the variable that can be of the least use for the discrimination was found to be minimum ramus breadth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 One of the simple and accurate maturational indicator is skeletal development. 2 Age bring changes in teeth and bone including the facial bones. 3 Also, these structures remains for a very long period of life and serve as a reliable indicator of age, with mandibular bone being more valuable as its remodeling is continuous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%