2017
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2017/27927.10051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Determination by Biometry of Anterior Features of Human Hip Bones in South Indian Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study found male acetabula to be larger in diameter than female acetabula, with a p-value of <0.001, deeming this result highly significant. This correlated with previous studies, which reported that males had a larger acetabular diameter than females (Chauhan et al, 2002;Zeng et al;Yugesh & Kumar;Rajasekhar et al). This finding was statistically significant in the studies conducted by Chauhan et al, Zeng et al, Yugesh & Kumar and Rajasekhar et al However, the finding was insignificant in the study conducted by Krebs et al (2009) on the acetabula of African-American and Caucasian people in America (Table V).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study found male acetabula to be larger in diameter than female acetabula, with a p-value of <0.001, deeming this result highly significant. This correlated with previous studies, which reported that males had a larger acetabular diameter than females (Chauhan et al, 2002;Zeng et al;Yugesh & Kumar;Rajasekhar et al). This finding was statistically significant in the studies conducted by Chauhan et al, Zeng et al, Yugesh & Kumar and Rajasekhar et al However, the finding was insignificant in the study conducted by Krebs et al (2009) on the acetabula of African-American and Caucasian people in America (Table V).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Marieb & Hoehn (2013) stated that in general, female acetabula are smaller and farther apart in comparison to male acetabula. Rajasekhar et al (2017) found male acetabula to be significantly larger in diameter than female acetabula. Furthermore, the acetabular depth was also found to be significantly larger in males than in females (Yugesh & Kumar, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As shown in Table 4, the present study indicates that the cotylopubic length was of smaller value while acetabulum diameter was showing higher value in males when compared to corresponding values in females and found to be consistent with the results of similar studies. [13][14][15][16][17][18] The present study found out that the acetabulopubic index showed highest sexual dimorphism followed by of sexing when compared with that of Nagesh KR et al 23 in which accuracy percentage for sex determination was 17% with AP index of >88.4 in case of males, whereas in case of females, AP index <66.9 made out 26% of female bones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Sex determination based on skeletal remains is essential in forensic investigations and human identi cation after mass disasters, homicides, and accidents 1,2 . Manual morphological measurement and analysis of the skeletal remains are widely used to determine the sex of individuals [4][5][6][7][8][9]27 . In particular, the unique patterns of the frontal sinuses in males and females on CBCT scans make these sinuses an important and reliable tool for sex determination 16,20,34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skeletal remains of the human body can preserve their shapes and structures even in harsh environments and disaster events, making them suitable for sex determination 3 . Manual morphological measurement and analysis of skeletal remains such as the hand bone 4 , hip bone 5 , teeth 6 , mandible 7 , skull 7 , and paranasal sinus 8,9 are widely used to determine the sex of individuals. These methods are based on the presence of signi cant differences in the sizes and shapes of the teeth, pelvis, and skull between males and females 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%