2009
DOI: 10.1080/00379271.2009.10697610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-dependent seasonal feeding activity variations among two species of Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera) in the Mexican tropical dry forest

Abstract: Tropical dry forest, such as that found in Mexico, is a biome where very few alimentary resources are available during 6 months of the year. Within some families of Lepidoptera such as Nymphalidae, some species are known to survive the dry season as adults using the few decayed pulp fruits available as a food source. We compared the temporal abundance and sex ratio of two model species, one belonging to the subfamily Charaxinae, found world-wide, and one belonging to the subfamily Biblidinae, endemic to the Am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pattern of butterfly abundance peaking through the wet season found here is concordant with the majority of studies into temporal dynamics of tropical insects (Wolda 1978, Novotny & Basset 1998, Grimbacher et al 2009, for a review Kishimoto-Yamada & Itioka 2015), and particularly with studies focused on butterfly communities distributed in Neotropical dry forests (Shahabuddin et al 1999, Pozo et al 2008, Torres et al 2009, Checa et al 2010, Checa 2014.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pattern of butterfly abundance peaking through the wet season found here is concordant with the majority of studies into temporal dynamics of tropical insects (Wolda 1978, Novotny & Basset 1998, Grimbacher et al 2009, for a review Kishimoto-Yamada & Itioka 2015), and particularly with studies focused on butterfly communities distributed in Neotropical dry forests (Shahabuddin et al 1999, Pozo et al 2008, Torres et al 2009, Checa et al 2010, Checa 2014.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Species detection probability or detectability may additionally bias the observed seasonal patterns. For example, sunny days enhance butterfly activity, hence increasing probability of trap captures, and the level of bait attractiveness may differ over seasons (Torres et al 2009, Ribeiro et al 2015. Although these factors can certainly explain some variation, the bias produced is likely to be negligible in this study since butterfly abundance peaks were detected during the wettest part of the year (the dry season encompasses a larger number of sunny days which increases the probability of both trap captures and scheduling sampling during warmer days), and differences in abundance among years and seasons were relatively large (see Checa et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adult fruit-feeding butterflies seem to compete for the same resources (e.g., fallen fruits), but there may be some specializations based on proboscis morphology (Molleman, Krenin, et al, 2005). Furthermore, species may differ in competitive ability leading to dominance hierarchies at fruit items (Torres, Osorio-Beristain, Mariano, & Legal, 2009). During the larval stage, competition among species depends on host-plant overlap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the sexes may differ in their responses to trap height and their tendency to remain trapped after entering a trap (Alexander & DeVries, ); therefore, we excluded species known to show marked sexual differences in flight altitude from the analyses, reducing the sample size for this analysis to 31 species. It is also possible that within butterfly species, males and females differ in their seasonal foraging activity, as previously shown in a Mexican dry forest (Torres, Osorio‐Beristain, Mariano, & Legal, ). Nevertheless, this effect is likely offset by the long duration of our study (1–6 years) and may not be as pronounced given the moderate seasonality of the butterfly community at our study site (Valtonen et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%