1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf00346825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex change in plants: Old and new observations and new hypotheses

Abstract: Evidence is presented that individuals of a large number of dioecious and subdioecious plant species are able to alter their sexual state in response to changes in the ambient environment and/or changes in size or age. We suggest that lability of sexual expression probably has survival value where a significant portion of the females must otherwise bear the cost of fruit production in unfavorable environments. We demonstrate that in patchy environments of the proper scale and variability in quality, labile sex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
240
1
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 321 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
5
240
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6, p. 230). Despite subsequent experimental demonstrations of stress-induced maleness in plants, quantitative Darwinian treatment remained lacking until Freeman et al (7) used a newly emergent theory on environmental sex determination (8,9) to present an evolutionarily stable strategy model predicting stress-induced maleness in plants occupying patchily stressful environments. Freeman et al (7) considered the example of patch dryness, but stress could mean any condition induced by the physical or biological environment that reduces scope for resource allocation or survivorship and, hence, reduces fitness (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6, p. 230). Despite subsequent experimental demonstrations of stress-induced maleness in plants, quantitative Darwinian treatment remained lacking until Freeman et al (7) used a newly emergent theory on environmental sex determination (8,9) to present an evolutionarily stable strategy model predicting stress-induced maleness in plants occupying patchily stressful environments. Freeman et al (7) considered the example of patch dryness, but stress could mean any condition induced by the physical or biological environment that reduces scope for resource allocation or survivorship and, hence, reduces fitness (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals of a large number of dioecious species are able to change their sexual expression showing sex lability (reviewed in Freeman et al 1980;Korpelainen 1998) and this may cause biased sex ratios (vi). Two mutually not exclusive explanations have been proposed to explain sex lability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, several environmental conditions have been reported to be responsible for switching sex (reviewed in Korpelainen 1998). Sex changes in plants have been considered as a strategy of sex allocation to enhance fitness over the lifetime of plants (Freeman et al 1980;Policansky 1981;Lloyd and Bawa 1984). Sexually labile plants have the potential to have either female, male or both sex organs, with some environmental feature determining which genes are switched on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than interpreting results in light of fixed sexuality of individuals, we suggest that they could be seen as indications of dactylanthus as a dioecious species with labile sex, environmental sex determination (ESD) and associated sex change of individuals (Dellaporta and Calderon-Urrea 1993;Freeman et al 1980 and references therein). Resource availability has been identified as one factor for ESD (Freeman et al 1980), with increased resources often linked to a higher percentage of the female form of a species.…”
Section: Sex Distributionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Resource availability has been identified as one factor for ESD (Freeman et al 1980), with increased resources often linked to a higher percentage of the female form of a species. For the holoparasitic dactylanthus resources are solely determined by the host tree, therefore, the early dominance of female inflorescences and a change to male dominance could indicate a worsening of supply from host to parasite over time since the initial infection.…”
Section: Sex Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%