2019
DOI: 10.1210/en.2018-00949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-Biased lncRNAs Inversely Correlate With Sex-Opposite Gene Coexpression Networks in Diversity Outbred Mouse Liver

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HTSeq (0.6.1p1) was then used to obtain read counts for exon collapsed regions of RefSeq genes, and featureCounts (1.4.6-p5) was used to obtain read counts for exon collapsed regions of lncRNA genes. A set of 24,197 annotated mouse RefSeq genes (which includes some RefSeq lncRNAs) and a set of 15,558 liver-expressed lncRNA genes (Lodato et al, 2017;Melia and Waxman, 2019) was considered for differential expression analysis. These lncRNAs include intergenic lncRNAs, as well as lncRNAs that are antisense or intragenic with respect to RefSeq genes, and were discovered using a computational pipeline for lncRNA discovery described elsewhere (Melia et al, 2016) based on 186 mouse liver RNA-seq datasets representing 30 different biological conditions.…”
Section: Analysis Of Sequencing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…HTSeq (0.6.1p1) was then used to obtain read counts for exon collapsed regions of RefSeq genes, and featureCounts (1.4.6-p5) was used to obtain read counts for exon collapsed regions of lncRNA genes. A set of 24,197 annotated mouse RefSeq genes (which includes some RefSeq lncRNAs) and a set of 15,558 liver-expressed lncRNA genes (Lodato et al, 2017;Melia and Waxman, 2019) was considered for differential expression analysis. These lncRNAs include intergenic lncRNAs, as well as lncRNAs that are antisense or intragenic with respect to RefSeq genes, and were discovered using a computational pipeline for lncRNA discovery described elsewhere (Melia et al, 2016) based on 186 mouse liver RNA-seq datasets representing 30 different biological conditions.…”
Section: Analysis Of Sequencing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 13,343 were intergenic, 1,966 were antisense, and 249 were intragenic lncRNAs. 44% of the 15,558 liver-expressed lncRNAs are considered novel (Melia and Waxman, 2019). Differential gene expression analysis revealed that a total of 1,735 RefSeq genes and 442 liver-expressed lncRNA genes responded to treatment with WY-14643 at an expression foldchange >2 at FDR<0.05, with 968 RefSeq genes and 245 lncRNA genes upregulated, and 767 RefSeq genes and 197 lncRNA genes downregulated following WY-14643 treatment ( Table S1A and Table S1B).…”
Section: Lncrna Regulation By Ppara Is Highly Tissue-specificmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The health impacts of sex differences in liver include a higher incidence of aggressive liver cancer in males [5], increased susceptibility to autoimmune hepatitis in females [6], and sex differences in metabolism of some pharmaceuticals and environmental chemicals [7]. Transcriptomic and epigenetic sex-bias is best characterized in mouse liver, where ~1,000 genes [8], including many lncRNA genes [9,10] and miRNAs [11], exhibit sex-biased expression that may be regulated by thousands of sex-specific DNase I hypersensitive sites (DHS) [12,13]. This prior work has shown that the majority of sex-biased genes do not have geneproximal sex-biased chromatin marks or DHS, suggesting most epigenetic sex bias occurs at distal elements such as enhancers [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viewpoints in Figure 4 show merged results from 3 biological replicates (n=3 per sex), each library prepared from a separate CD-1 mouse liver (see Methods) and example libraries shown in Figure S5A,B. Figure 4A shows a viewpoint anchored at a female-biased enhancer near the strongly female-biased gene A1bg (F/M expression ratio of 155) as well as 12 female-biased, mono-exonic lncRNAs [10]. In the female samples, robust interactions are observed between the viewpoint enhancer and three regions, indicated by red arrows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%