2012
DOI: 10.1101/gr.134981.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-biased genetic effects on gene regulation in humans

Abstract: Human regulatory variation, reported as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), contributes to differences between populations and tissues. The contribution of eQTLs to differences between sexes, however, has not been investigated to date. Here we explore regulatory variation in females and males and demonstrate that 12%-15% of autosomal eQTLs function in a sex-biased manner. We show that genes possessing sex-biased eQTLs are expressed at similar levels across the sexes and highlight cases of genes control… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
73
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
11
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed no significant enrichment of genes with sex-specific expression for the top 100 sex-interacting eQTLs (odds ratio = 0.4 [0.05-1.58], P-value = 3.3 × 10 −1 , Fisher's exact test) compared to the background of genes expressed in whole blood. Concordant with a previous study (Dimas et al 2012), this demonstrates that sex-interacting eQTLs likely do not arise as a consequence of expression differences between the sexes and may result from other factors that differ in a sex-specific matter, such as transcription factor activity, hormone receptors, and chromatin accessibility.…”
Section: Regulatory Variation Onsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed no significant enrichment of genes with sex-specific expression for the top 100 sex-interacting eQTLs (odds ratio = 0.4 [0.05-1.58], P-value = 3.3 × 10 −1 , Fisher's exact test) compared to the background of genes expressed in whole blood. Concordant with a previous study (Dimas et al 2012), this demonstrates that sex-interacting eQTLs likely do not arise as a consequence of expression differences between the sexes and may result from other factors that differ in a sex-specific matter, such as transcription factor activity, hormone receptors, and chromatin accessibility.…”
Section: Regulatory Variation Onsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Our study overcomes several limitations of previous eQTL and sex-specific eQTL studies which have either ignored the X Chromosome, conducted analyses in cell lines which may inaccurately reflect in vivo sex differences (Dimas et al 2012), had insufficient power to detect sex-specific eQTLs (Trabzuni et al 2013), or focused on only specific variants for sex-specific eQTL analysis (Castagne et al 2011;Yao et al 2014). We extend these studies to describe the characteristics of eQTL on the X Chromosome versus the autosomes, address the relationship between sex-specific gene expression and chromatin accessibility, and identify the contribution of multiple eQTLs to informing sex-biased disease risks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies by Dimas et al (23) and Kentet al (22) formally tested genotype × sex (or genotype × age) interaction in 379 lymphoblastoid cell lines and 1240 peripheral mononuclear cell samples, respectively. We were unable to replicate their findings of sex interaction of rs167769 and rs2872507 or age interaction for UBQLNL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among genes that display sex-specific or age-related changes in expression, a subset may exhibit genotype interaction with sex or age. While some sex-specific (16,17) and numerous age-related expression changes (18)(19)(20)(21) have been identified, few studies have yet considered sex-and age-interactions in eQTL analysis (22,23).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 There is evidence to suggest that the effect of genetic factors on disease risk may be influenced by sex. 5,6 Dimas et al found that 12-15% of autosomal gene expression quantitative trait loci were sexually dimorphic, and these sex-specific differences in gene regulation are likely to have sex-specific effects on disease. 5,6 Thus, we hypothesized that some JIA risk loci may affect disease risk differentially in females and males.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%